Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
[Arterial pulse pressure in relation to the duration of type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional controlled study]
J C Philips1, M Marchand, L Weekers
1Service de diabétologie, nutrition et maladies métaboliques, département de médecine, CHU Sart Tilman, Université de Liège, Belgique. jcphilips@chu.ulg.ac.be
Abstract:
Diabetes mellitus and arterial pulse pressure (PP) are two independent cardiovascular risk factors. This cross-sectional study investigated the influence of diabetes duration on PP in type 1 diabetic patients without any cardiovascular disease. PP was measured continuously during 3 minutes (active orthostatic test: 1 min standing--1 min squatting--1 min standing) using a fingertip plethysmograph (Finapres) in 159 type 1 diabetic patients aged 20-60 yrs. They were divided into 4 groups according to diabetes duration: (1) G1 : <10 yrs (n=39); G2: 11-20 yrs (n=45); G3: 21-30 yrs (n=57); and G4: >30 yrs (n=18). In order to separate the effects of age from the effects of diabetes duration, diabetic patients were compared to age- and sex-matched non diabetic controls. PP (expressed in mmHg; mean +/- SD) was higher in men than in women in both diabetic (58 +/- 15 vs. 50 +/- 14; p = 0.001) and non diabetic subjects (55 +/- 14 vs. 47 +/- 12; p = 0.001). Overall PP was higher in diabetic than in non diabetic individuals (54 +/- 15 vs. 50 +/- 13; p = 0.025). PP progressively increased according to diabetes duration: 47 +/- 16 vs. 51 +/- 13 vs. 59 +/- 14 vs. 62 +/- 12, from G1 to G4 respectively; p < 0.0001. Such an increase was not observed in age-matched non diabetic subjects: 50 +/- 11 vs. 52 +/- 12 vs. 49 +/- 14 vs. 52 +/- 18, from G1 to G4, respectively; NS. PP was higher in squatting than in standing position in non diabetic subjects (52 +/- 16 vs. 47 +/- 13; p < 0.0001) and even more in diabetic patients (59 +/- 17 vs. 50 +/- 14; p < 0.0001). Overall, PP difference between diabetic and non diabetic individuals was not significant in standing position (50 +/- 14 vs. 47 +/- 13; NS) although it became highly significant in squatting position (59 +/- 17 vs. 52 +/- 16; p = 0.0005). The squatting-standing difference in PP markedly increased with diabetes duration: 69 +/- 14 during squatting vs. 50 +/- 18 during standing in G4 compared to respectively 50 +/- 17 vs. 44 +/- 15 in G1 diabetic patients. Finally, PP was similar (NS) in diabetic patients with HbA1c < 8% (54 +/- 14) or > or =8% (55 +/- 16), with (57 +/- 17) or without (54 +/- 14) microalbuminuria, treated (56 +/- 14) or not (54 +/- 15) by inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. In conclusion, PP progressively increased with the duration of type 1 diabetes, independently of age. Such increase was more marked in squatting than in standing position. The role of such PP rise in the increased cardiovascular risk of patients with type 1 diabetes, although suspected in the recent EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study, deserves further investigation.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Blood Pressure
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure