Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.

Alejandro Cervino1, Sarah L Hosking, Gurjeet K Rai

  • 1School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, United Kingdom.

Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
|October 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balanced Extended Vision Procedure: Preclinical Analysis of a Non-diffractive Approach to Full Range of Vision After Cataract Surgery.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Six-Month Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Biaspheric Trifocal IOL in Asian and European Cataract Patients: A Comparative Study.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

Organosolv processing of Sitka spruce sawdust: large scale preparation of native-like lignin and lignin<sup>OX</sup> for valorisation.

Faraday discussions·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of an AI-Based Tool for Postoperative Vault Estimation in Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

<i>In</i> <i>vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> analyses of surface whitening in hydrophobic trifocal intraocular lenses.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Posterior Capsular Opacification and Glistening in Hydrophobic Monofocal Biaspheric Intraocular Lens Two Years After Implantation: A Case Control Study.

Journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same journal

Thresholding and Calibration for Machine Learning-Based Detection of Prior Laser Vision Correction.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

A Toric Plate-Haptic Intraocular Lens Suitable for Flanged Scleral Fixation.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Refractive and Corneal Astigmatism After Implantation of a Supraciliary Drainage Device in Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Estimating Range of Vision and Optical Function Related to Pupil Size in a Spiral Intraocular Lens.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Anterior Chambers Shallower Than 2.5 mm in Eyes With Short to Normal Axial Length: Can Artificial Intelligence-Based Lens Formulas Achieve Reliable Accuracy?

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Using the VISUMAX 800 Laser in a Prospective Multicenter Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
See all related articles

Wavefront analyzers showed higher myopia measurements than the SRW-5000 autorefractor in non-cycloplegic eyes, likely due to accommodation excess. Agreement for astigmatism was good for low degrees.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Accurate refractive error determination is crucial for vision correction.
  • Wavefront analyzers offer advanced aberrometry, but their accuracy in non-cycloplegic states requires validation against established methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the refractive error accuracy of three wavefront analyzers against a validated binocular open-view autorefractor.
  • To evaluate the agreement in spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Eighty healthy adult eyes were examined using the SRW-5000 autorefractor and three wavefront analyzers (OPD-Scan, WASCA, Allegretto).
  • Refractive errors were measured without cycloplegia, and data were analyzed using vector components (M, J0, J45).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three readings per instrument were collected, and statistical analysis included correlation and mean differences with limits of agreement.

    • Main Results:

    • All wavefront analyzers showed a positive correlation with the SRW-5000 for spherical equivalent refraction (r > 0.94, P < .001).
    • Wavefront analyzers consistently measured more myopic spherical equivalent refraction (0.30 to 0.51 D higher) compared to the SRW-5000 (P < .001).
    • No statistically significant differences were found for J0 and J45 (astigmatism components) between the instruments for low astigmatism (<2.0 D).

    Conclusions:

    • Wavefront analyzers may induce instrument myopia in non-cycloplegic eyes due to accommodation excess.
    • Despite higher myopia readings, wavefront analyzers demonstrate good agreement with the SRW-5000 for low astigmatism.
    • Clinical consideration of accommodative response is important when interpreting wavefront analyzer results in non-cycloplegic refractions.