Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Asya Shpiro1, Rodica Curtu, John Rinzel

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. avs203@nyu.edu

Journal of Neurophysiology
|October 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuronal spiking in the mammalian forebrain is dominated by a heterogeneous ground state.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Complementary cognitive roles for D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs during interval timing.

eLife·2025
Same author

Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Perceptual tri-stability, measured and fitted as emergent from a model for bistable alternations.

Hearing research·2024
Same author

Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Neuronal competition models show that stimulus strength affects dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Models predict a non-monotonic relationship, challenging existing theories.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Reciprocally inhibitory neuronal populations are key to modeling bistable perception, like binocular rivalry.
  • Existing models vary in architecture, gain functions, and implementation of alternating dominance dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of input strength on oscillation rates and existence in neuronal competition models.
  • To identify common dynamical behaviors across different models of neuronal competition.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of several computational models with varying architectures and gain functions.
  • Examination of the effect of input strength on model dynamics, specifically oscillation rates and dominance durations.
  • Comparison of model predictions with experimental findings, including Levelt's Proposition IV.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All models exhibit similar qualitative dynamical features, regardless of architectural differences.
  • Models predict that dominance durations decrease with increasing stimulus strength, consistent with Levelt's Proposition IV.
  • A novel prediction is that at lower input strengths, dominance durations increase with stimulus strength, indicating a non-monotonic relationship.

Conclusions:

  • Neuronal competition models share common dynamical behaviors concerning input strength and dominance durations.
  • The predicted non-monotonic relationship between stimulus strength and dominance duration requires further experimental validation.
  • Reconciliation between computational models and perceptual evidence for Levelt's Proposition IV necessitates additional empirical testing.