Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical analysis of disease onset during lifespan with left truncation.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Rejoinder to Commentaries on "A Perspective on the Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies for Handling Intercurrent Events".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Eligibility of men vs. women in Alzheimer's trials: Inclusive vs. representative.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026
Same author

Interrupted Time Series Methods for Nonrandom Sampling Study Designs With Known Sampling Weights.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Semaglutide, weight loss, and cardiovascular outcomes in the SELECT trial - Authors' reply.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Baseline Aspirin Use: Analyses of the SOUL and SELECT Trials.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Bayesian evaluation of group sequential clinical trial designs.

Scott S Emerson1, John M Kittelson, Daniel L Gillen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Box 357232, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7232, USA. semerson@u.washington.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|October 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces methods for evaluating Bayesian operating characteristics of sequential stopping rules in clinical trials. It provides a framework for communicating these Bayesian properties effectively to researchers.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • Sequential stopping rules are crucial for early clinical trial termination.
  • Frequentist operating characteristics (Type I error, power) are commonly used to select these rules.
  • There is a growing trend towards Bayesian analysis in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the evaluation of Bayesian operating characteristics for sequential stopping rules.
  • To provide a method for communicating these Bayesian properties to the scientific community.
  • To facilitate the use of Bayesian approaches in clinical trial design.

Main Methods:

  • Consideration of specific probability models.
  • Utilizing a family of prior distributions.
  • Development of concise presentation methods for Bayesian properties.
  • Application to a defined sampling plan.

Main Results:

  • A framework for assessing Bayesian operating characteristics of stopping rules is presented.
  • The proposed methods allow for clear communication of Bayesian trial properties.
  • The approach is applicable to various sampling plans within a Bayesian context.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian operating characteristics can be effectively evaluated and communicated.
  • This work supports the integration of Bayesian methods in clinical trial design and analysis.
  • The presented framework aids in the informed selection of sequential stopping rules using Bayesian principles.