Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Integrating economic costs into the analysis of flexible conservation management strategies
Martin Drechsler1, Karin Johst, Frank Wätzold
1Department of Ecological Modelling, UFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, Leipzig, Germany. martin.drechsler@ufz.de
Abstract:
Flexible conservation management, where measures (e.g., mowing of meadows, removing invasive species) are selected in each decision period depending on the current state of the ecological system, is generally perceived as superior to fixed management, where the same measure is applied in each decision period independent of the current state of the system. In past comparisons of fixed and flexible conservation strategies the additional costs that arise only in flexible strategies have usually been ignored. In this paper, we present a framework to integrate costs of flexible management into the evaluation of flexible conservation strategies. Using the example of an endangered butterfly species we demonstrate that the costs of flexible management may reverse the rank order of flexible and fixed conservation strategies, such that fixed strategies may lead to better ecological results than flexible ones for the same financial budget.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Conservation of Small Populations
Conservation of Declining Populations
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

