Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating the efficacy of neurofeedback for optimising performance.

John Gruzelier1, Tobias Egner, David Vernon

  • 1Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, Lewisham Way, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK. j.gruzelier@gold.ac.uk

Progress in Brain Research
|October 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual working memory for real-world objects is resistant to visual but vulnerable to semantic interference.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

When forewarned is not forearmed: No evidence for cue-based proactive control in the spatial Stroop task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Efficacy and effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder: From lab to reality.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Neurofeedback training protocols for attention, memory, and performance show benefits validated by cognitive and neurophysiological measures. These findings offer initial scientific support for neurofeedback, though further research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Biofeedback

Background:

  • Neurofeedback training lacks extensive scientific validation.
  • Previous research has explored various neurofeedback protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate specific neurofeedback protocols (SMR, beta, alpha-theta).
  • To assess improvements in attention, memory, mood, and performance in healthy individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Review of studies on SMR, beta, and alpha-theta neurofeedback protocols.
  • Utilized cognitive and neurophysiological measures for assessment.
  • Employed regression models to predict learning outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrable benefits in cognitive and neurophysiological measures were observed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Observed benefits aligned with predictions from regression models of learning.
  • Positive impacts on attention, memory, mood, and performance were noted.

    • Conclusions:

    • Initial steps toward establishing a scientific basis for neurofeedback.
    • Further research is essential to fully validate neurofeedback efficacy.
    • Neurofeedback shows promise for enhancing cognitive functions and performance.