Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sample size determination for matched-pair equivalence trials using rate ratio.

Nian-Sheng Tang1, Man-Lai Tang, Shun-Fang Wang

  • 1Department of Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|October 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatially Correlated Analysis of Infectious Disease Outcomes Based on Bayesian Functional Hierarchical Models.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Functional varying-coefficient Cox model and its application.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model.

Applied psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Bayesian analysis of joint quantile regression for multi-response longitudinal data with application to primary biliary cirrhosis sequential cohort study.

Statistical methods in medical research·2024
Same author

Sample size determination for interval estimation of the prevalence of a sensitive attribute under non-randomized response models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024
Same author

A Bayesian multistage spatio-temporally dependent model for spatial clustering and variable selection.

Statistics in medicine·2023

This study compares statistical methods for equivalence testing in matched-pair designs. Constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimation offers superior performance and reliable sample size calculations for binary endpoints.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Equivalence testing is crucial for demonstrating therapeutic similarity.
  • Matched-pair designs are common in clinical studies, especially with binary endpoints.
  • Evaluating different statistical methods is essential for accurate trial design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Wald-type, logarithmic transformation, and Fieller-type statistics for 2-sided equivalence testing of the rate ratio in matched-pair designs.
  • To develop and evaluate sample size formulae based on constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimation.
  • To assess the performance of these methods in terms of type I error rate and confidence interval width.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of Wald-type, logarithmic transformation, and Fieller-type statistics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation using sample-based, constrained least squares, and CML estimation.
  • Development of sample size formulae controlling power or confidence width.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate statistical performance and sample size validity.
  • Main Results:

    • Statistics based on CML estimation generally outperform other methods.
    • CML-based methods show better control of type I error rates and narrower confidence intervals.
    • Asymptotically valid sample size formulae were developed, with close adherence to prespecified power and coverage probabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimation is recommended for equivalence testing in matched-pair designs with binary endpoints.
    • The developed sample size formulae provide a reliable basis for study planning.
    • The findings are applicable to clinical laboratory studies and similar research settings.