Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
Published on: April 8, 2016
Immunohistochemistry quantification by a digital computer-assisted method compared to semiquantitative analysis
Leandro Luongo de Matos1, Elaine Stabenow, Marcos Roberto Tavares
1Biochemistry Department, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, ABC Foundation, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. lmatos@amcham.com.br
Purpose:
To compare immunostaining quantification obtained by a digital computer-assisted method with the well-established semiquantitative analysis.
Methods:
Cytoplasmic staining of galectin-3 was obtained by standard immunohistochemical reactions in 25 cases of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. The expression index that associates the conventional area fraction of labeled cells with the immunostaining intensity score based on visual qualitative observation was used as the semiquantitative analysis. A digital computer-assisted method is described based on the use of an image processing program (ImageLab). Three parameters were obtained: (1) percentage of labeled cells; (2) digital immunostaining intensity, and (3) digital expression index. The proposed method allows numerical analysis of the immunostaining intensity.
Results:
There was a strong correlation between the immunostaining intensity obtained by the two methods (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.71, P = 0.0001). The same was observed between expression indexes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.66, P = 0.0001).
Conclusion:
Results obtained with our proposed digital computer-assisted method for immunoexpression analysis were concordant with the semiquantitative analysis. In addition, digital values can also resolve disagreement among different observers about the quality of staining intensity because the digital method does not classify the results into groups, but rather provides a numerical value for each individual case; thus, it increases the diagnostic and, more importantly, the prognostic sensitivity of the immunohistochemical analysis.
