[Indication, technique, and results of aortic valve and ascending aorta reconstruction]

Aortic valve replacement is the standard procedure in patients with aortic valve regurgitation (AR). Although long-term results for both biological and mechanical heart valves could be improved, a valve-sparing operation has several advantages especially in young patients. Alterations in the geometry of the aortic root, especially dilatation of the sinutubular junction, are the primary cause of AR in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta. In patients with a bicuspid aortic valve, AR is usually caused by a prolapse; with appropriate surgical experience, the prolapse can be corrected and the valve reconstructed. Isolated reconstruction of a tricuspid aortic valve such as decalcification, commissurotomy or plication of ring or leaflets are seldom indicated. The recontstructive techniques for aortic root aneurysms or type A dissection described by David and Yacoub have become routine procedures over the last decade. The long-term clinical results are excellent, and revision and thromboembolism rates are very low. A maximal diameter of the aortic root > 5 cm is indicative for performing the above procedures. This technique has been used in the own clinic since 1996 with excellent clinical and echocardiographic results. Only four of 101 patients operated had a moderate AR during the follow-up period. The reconstruction of a prolapse in a bicuspid aortic valve is possible by using an autologous, fixed pericardial patch, with very good long-term results. By using this surgical technique, two geometrically correct pockets with a broad coaptation zone can be constructed. In 36 of the patients operated in the own clinic, only four patients showed grade I AR. No patient had to undergo reoperation. An aortic valve reconstruction for an isolated leaflet perforation following a healed endocarditis is seldom indicated.In the authors' opinion, valve-sparing reconstruction in cases of aneurysms of the ascending aorta, and for bicuspid valves, represents a promising alternative to prosthetic valve replacement. With low surgical mortality and morbidity, excellent clinical and functional long-term results can be achieved. Furthermore, the lack of the necessity of anticoagulation as well as positive hemodynamic factors argue for a valve-sparing surgical technique. A final evaluation of the method is not possible, however, until long-term follow-up of up to 20 years is available and the positive results have been confirmed.