Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Electrophysiological Measurements and Analysis of Nociception in Human Infants
Published on: December 20, 2011
Evaluation and development of potentially better practices to improve pain management of neonates
Paul J Sharek1, Richard Powers, Amy Koehn
1Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. psharek@lpch.org
Insights
Improving neonatal pain management is crucial. A collaborative quality improvement initiative enhanced pain assessment and treatment in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) by implementing evidence-based practices.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Pain management
- Quality improvement science
Background:
- Neonatal pain management remains suboptimal despite advances in knowledge and regulatory requirements.
- Ineffective translation of research findings into clinical practice hinders progress in neonatal pain care.
- The Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative (NIQIC) was established to bridge this gap by facilitating research translation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a collaborative process for improving neonatal pain management.
- To utilize quality improvement (QI) methodologies to enhance pain assessment and treatment in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).
Main Methods:
- An exploratory group of 12 NIQIC members focused on improving neonatal pain management.
- Established group and site-specific goals, and outcome measures.
- Developed and implemented potentially better practices based on literature review, and collected baseline outcome data.
Main Results:
- A primary goal to improve neonatal pain assessment and management was set, with individual sites establishing local improvement targets.
- Baseline data from 277 neonates revealed significant variability in procedures and low rates of pain assessment (17%) and analgesic intervention (19%).
- Ten prioritized potentially better practices were developed, and 61 new practices were implemented across 12 participating NICUs.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative QI methods fostered self-directed, efficient, and effective processes for enhancing neonatal pain management.
- The establishment of shared best practices, collective goals, and baseline data accelerated the adoption of improved clinical practices.
- This collaborative approach facilitated clinical practice improvements that might not occur in isolated settings.
Objective:
Despite increased knowledge, improved options, and regulatory mandates, pain management of neonates remains inadequate, promoted by the ineffective translation of research data into clinical practice. The Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 was created to provide participating NICUs the tools necessary to translate research, related to prevention and treatment of neonatal pain, into practice. The objective for this study was to use proven quality improvement methods to develop a process to improve neonatal pain management collaboratively.
Methods:
Twelve members of the Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 formed an exploratory group to improve neonatal pain management. The exploratory group established group and site-specific goals and outcome measures for this project. Group members crafted a list of potentially better practices on the basis of the available literature, encouraged implementation of the potentially better practices at individual sites, developed a database for sharing information, and measured baseline outcomes.
Results:
The goal "improve the assessment and management of infants experiencing pain in the NICU" was established. In addition, each site within the group identified local goals for improvement in neonatal pain management. Data from 7 categories of neonates (N = 277) were collected within 48 hours of NICU admission to establish baseline data for clinical practices. Ten potentially better practices were developed for prioritized pain conditions, and 61 potentially better practices were newly implemented at the 12 participating sites. Various methods were used for pain assessment at the participating centers. At baseline, heel sticks were used more frequently than peripheral intravenous insertions or venipunctures, with substantial variability in the number of avoidable procedures between centers. Pain was assessed in only 17% of procedures, and analgesic interventions were performed in 19% of the procedures at baseline.
Conclusions:
Collaborative use of quality improvement methods resulted in the creation of self-directed, efficient, and effective processes to improve neonatal pain management. Group establishment of potentially better practices, collective and site-specific goals, and extensive baseline data resulted in accelerated implementation of clinical practices that would not likely occur outside a collaborative setting.
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

