Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
[The Chinese registry on reperfusion strategies and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction]
Li-tian Yu1, Jun Zhu, Rebecca Mister
1Department of Cardiology, Fu-wai Hospital, Beijing 100037, China.
Insights
Reperfusion therapy significantly improves outcomes for ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Increasing reperfusion rates in China is crucial for better patient survival and reduced heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
- Interventional Cardiology
Context:
- ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) require timely reperfusion.
- Understanding current reperfusion strategies in China is essential.
- Patient outcomes are directly linked to reperfusion timeliness and efficacy.
Purpose:
- To analyze reperfusion strategies used in China for ST-elevation ACS.
- To evaluate the outcomes of patients receiving reperfusion therapy.
- To identify factors associated with non-receipt of reperfusion therapy.
Summary:
- 518 ST-elevation ACS patients were studied across 20 Chinese hospitals.
- 56% received reperfusion (primary PCI or fibrinolysis); 44% did not.
- No reperfusion was linked to higher mortality and heart failure rates at 3 months.
Impact:
- Reperfusion therapy is key to improving ST-elevation ACS patient outcomes.
- There is an urgent need to increase reperfusion therapy rates in China.
- No significant outcome differences were observed between primary PCI and fibrinolysis.
Objective:
To analyze the current use of reperfusion strategies and the outcomes of patients with ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in China.
Methods:
A total of 518 consecutive patients (371 male and 147 females, mean age 65 +/- 11) with ST elevation ACS or newly discovered left bundle branch block were registered from 20 hospitals from 5 regions (ranging from large regional centre hospitals to small county hospitals) in China. Patient general characteristics, reperfusion patterns and outcomes were analyzed. Patients were followed up for 3 months.
Results:
The median time from pain onset to presentation at the hospital was 4 hours. Pre-hospital delay > 12 hours was found in 20% patients. Fifty-six percent patients (292/518) underwent reperfusion therapy (134 with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and 158 with fibrinolysis). The median time from admission to reperfusion (door-to-needle) was 65 min in fibrinolysis group and 110 min (door-to-cath) in primary PCI group respectively. Urokinase was used in 67% (106/158) patients underwent fibrinolysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age >/= 75 years (P < 0.01), previous myocardial infarction (P < 0.01) and history of congestive heart failure (P < 0.05) were associated with no reperfusion therapy. Mortality and congestive heart failure rates were significantly higher in patients with no reperfusion therapy not only at discharge (P < 0.01) but also at 3 months (P < 0.01) compared to patients underwent reperfusion. The incidence of combined outcomes (death or MI, and death, MI or Strobe) was also higher in patients without reperfusion therapy at 3 months (all P < 0.01) compared to patients underwent reperfusion. There were no differences on combined outcomes between fibrinolysis and primary PCI subgroups.
Conclusion:
Reperfusion therapy was the primary treatment of choice to improve the outcomes of patients with ST elevation ACS. Strategies to increase reperfusion therapy rate for ST elevation ACS are urgently needed in China.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care