Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Precise, High-throughput Analysis of Bacterial Growth
Published on: September 19, 2017
Thermodynamic electron equivalents model for bacterial yield prediction: modifications and comparative evaluations
1Silas H. Palmer Professor Emeritus, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4020, USA. pmccarty@stanford.edu
The revised thermodynamic model (TEEM2) improves predictions of microbial growth yields by accounting for oxygenase involvement and C1 compound metabolism. This enhanced model offers greater accuracy for diverse microbial growth conditions.
Area of Science:
- Biochemical Engineering
- Microbial Physiology
- Thermodynamics
Background:
- Accurate prediction of microbial growth yields is crucial for biotechnology and environmental science.
- Earlier thermodynamic models like TEEM1 had limitations in predicting yields for specific metabolic pathways.
- Understanding energy transfer efficiency is key to refining these models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To revise and improve the thermodynamic model for predicting microbial growth yields (TEEM2).
- To correct for underestimations in yields involving oxygenase-mediated oxidations and single-carbon (C1) compounds.
- To evaluate the impact of energy transfer efficiency on model predictions.
Main Methods:
- Modified an existing thermodynamic model (TEEM1) to create TEEM2.
- Utilized reduction potential and Gibbs free energy calculations for energy release and consumption.
- Determined energy transfer efficiency using extensive literature data on aerobic heterotrophic yield.
- Validated TEEM2 predictions against experimental data for various organic compounds, including those metabolized via oxygenases and C1 compounds.
Main Results:
- Established an energy transfer efficiency of 0.37 for compounds following normal catabolic pathways, yielding 15%-20% prediction precision.
- TEEM2 showed improved, though slightly less accurate, predictions for oxygenase-involved oxidations (8% too high) and C1 compounds (17% too high) compared to TEEM1.
- The revised model demonstrated enhanced predictive capabilities over TEEM1 and other comparative models.
Conclusions:
- TEEM2 offers improved accuracy in predicting microbial growth yields across various conditions, including challenging substrates.
- Energy transfer efficiency is a critical parameter for accurate thermodynamic modeling of microbial growth.
- The refined model provides a valuable tool for optimizing bioprocesses and understanding microbial metabolism.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Bioreactor Controls-III
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Evolution of New Traits in Microbes
Bacterial Growth Curve
