Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attention and salience in associative blocking.

Stephen E Denton1, John K Kruschke

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1101 E. 10th St., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7007, USA.

Learning & Behavior
|November 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Blocking, an associative learning effect, is less likely with salient cues in humans. Highly salient cues can reduce the control of previously learned cues, explained by attentional shifts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Humans create more novelty than ChatGPT when asked to retell a story.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Serial reproduction of narratives preserves emotional appraisals.

Cognition & emotion·2022
Same author

Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines.

Nature human behaviour·2021
Same author

Lay evaluations of police and civilian use of force: Action severity scales.

Law and human behavior·2019
Same author

Editorial: Bayesian methods for advancing psychological science.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2018
Same author

Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Blocking is a well-documented associative learning phenomenon in cue-competition paradigms.
  • Previous research indicated salient cues are less susceptible to blocking in animals.
  • High salience of the to-be-blocked cue can diminish the control of the blocking cue.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate blocking effects in humans, extending prior animal research.
  • To explore the role of attentional shifts in explaining blocking phenomena.
  • To evaluate a connectionist model of attentional learning against empirical data.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants were exposed to cue-competition paradigms.
  • Stimulus salience was manipulated to assess its effect on blocking.
  • A connectionist model incorporating attentional learning mechanisms was developed and tested.

Main Results:

  • Human participants exhibited reduced blocking effects with salient cues.
  • Highly salient to-be-blocked cues led to a decrease in the blocking cue's control over responding.
  • The connectionist model accurately predicted the observed trends in human data.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional shifts provide a viable explanation for the observed loss of control in blocking.
  • The findings in humans align with previous observations in animal models.
  • Attentional learning, not mere forgetting, is crucial for explaining these associative learning dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos