Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator
Published on: May 19, 2023
Aviation model cognitive risk factors applied to medical malpractice cases
Stephen C Stripe1, Lyle G Best, Shirley Cole-Harding
1Center for Family Medicine Minot, University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Minot, ND 58701, USA. sstripe@medicine.nodak.edu
Objective:
Aviation accidents have been reduced substantially by training pilots to avoid high-risk behaviors caused by cognitive errors. To determine whether similar cognitive cause factors or errors are involved in medical malpractice cases, and to evaluate the reliability of identifying such factors, physicians reviewed state and federal malpractice cases in a legal database.
Method:
Reviewing physicians evaluated 30 cases meeting inclusion criteria from state and federal malpractice cases for the year 2004 in the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals region, using criteria for cognitive factors derived from aviation. The cases were categorized into three classes based on the degree of agreement between the reviewers. The results as to prevalence of the factors and reliability of identifying the factors were then analyzed statistically.
Results:
Fifty-nine percent of the cases met criteria for strong and good correlation with the factors. Cognitive factors involving IMSAFE (illness, medications, stress, alcohol, physiogical (f), and emotional) and medical team management/leadership can be reliably identified. Other factors, such as hazardous attitudes and loss of situational awareness, were identified with minimal reliability.
Conclusion:
The aeronautical cognitive causative approach can be translated into a medical approach to reliably identify cognitive causes of errors in a significant proportion of medical malpractice cases from a legal database.
Insights
Cognitive factors, like those in aviation, contribute to medical malpractice. A study found these factors, including IMSAFE (illness, medications, stress, alcohol, physiological, and emotional states), can be reliably identified in malpractice cases.
Area of Science:
- Medical error analysis
- Cognitive psychology
- Legal medicine
Background:
- Aviation safety has improved by addressing pilot cognitive errors.
- Medical malpractice cases may stem from similar cognitive factors.
- Reliable identification of these factors is crucial for prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if cognitive factors contribute to medical malpractice.
- To assess the reliability of identifying these cognitive factors in malpractice cases.
- To adapt aviation's cognitive error framework for medical applications.
Main Methods:
- Physicians reviewed 30 medical malpractice cases from 2004.
- Criteria for cognitive factors were adapted from aviation safety.
- Cases were categorized by reviewer agreement, and data were statistically analyzed.
Main Results:
- 59% of cases showed strong correlation with identified cognitive factors.
- Factors like IMSAFE (illness, medications, stress, alcohol, physiological, emotional) and team management were reliably identified.
- Hazardous attitudes and loss of situational awareness had minimal reliability.
Conclusions:
- The aviation cognitive causative approach is adaptable to medical malpractice.
- This approach reliably identifies cognitive causes in a significant portion of medical errors.
- Findings support using cognitive factor analysis to reduce medical errors and malpractice.
Related Concept Videos
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Torts II
The Availability Heuristic