Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...

Introspection

Introspection

Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparative Test Evaluation: Methods and Challenges.

Journal of gambling studies·2018

Same author

Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.

Journal of gambling studies·2017

Same author

Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?

Journal of gambling studies·2013

Same author

The validation of screening tests: meet the new screen same as the old screen?

Journal of gambling studies·2011

Same author

A test of the false positive bias hypothesis.

Journal of gambling studies·2007

Same author

A comment on the utility of prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.

Journal of gambling studies·2006

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Reflections on accuracy.

Blasé Gambino¹

¹blasegambinophd@aol.com

Journal of Gambling Studies

|November 11, 2006

Summary

Understanding test accuracy versus predictive accuracy is crucial for interpreting prevalence estimates. Misinterpreting these measures can lead to flawed conclusions about disease prevalence in different populations.

Area of Science:

Medical Diagnostics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology

Background:

Distinguishing between test accuracy and predictive accuracy is often overlooked.
This confusion can lead to misinterpretations of prevalence estimates in various populations.

Purpose of the Study:

To define and differentiate test accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) from predictive accuracy (positive predictive value, negative predictive value).
To explain how the choice of denominator impacts these accuracy measures.
To discuss the implications for interpreting prevalence estimates and setting diagnostic thresholds.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of accuracy metrics.
Examination of the role of base rates in prevalence estimation.
Discussion of diagnostic threshold implications.

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Main Results:

Test accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) differs fundamentally from predictive accuracy (PPV, NPV).
The choice of denominator in calculating rates (TP, FP, FN, TN) dictates the measure used.
Instruments tend to overestimate prevalence in low base rate populations and underestimate it in high base rate populations.

Conclusions:

Clear distinction between test and predictive accuracy is essential for accurate prevalence interpretation.
Prevalence over/underestimation is inherent to diagnostic tests based on population base rates.
Defining clinically and policy-relevant diagnostic thresholds is critical.