Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
Published on: March 27, 2012
Safe restraint of the child passenger
Leanne Cameron1, Elizabeth Segedin, Gabrielle Nuthall
1Emergency Department, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. matt.lee@xtra.co.nz
Aim:
The aim of this study was to understand the need for, and use of, booster seats in the 4-12 years age group and to identify risk factors for booster seat-non-use.
Method:
A cross-sectional sample of 1101 children aged 4-12 years travelling in 663 privately owned vehicles was taken from the Auckland region. Auckland is New Zealand's largest population centre, with a population of over 1.5 million. Information was gathered using a short questionnaire followed by direct inspection to identify those children using booster seats. The SafetyBeltSafe USA '5-step rule' was used to look at those children not using a booster seat to determine whether one was still required.
Results:
While booster seat use has improved significantly in younger children since a similar study in 1992, only 40% of sampled children requiring a booster seat were using one. Booster seat use by children requiring them declined sharply as age increased. While 93% of 5- to 8-year-olds required a booster, only 30% were using one. The requirement for booster seats fell dramatically to 34% of 9- to 12-year-olds, but only 3% were using one.
Conclusion:
The high rate of need for booster seats and the lack of use of booster seats in children aged 5-8 years is a strong argument for legislation and education programmes targeting this age group. While the proportion of 9- to 12-year-olds needing a booster drops sharply, there would likely be benefits from educating parents on the '5-step rule' or similar method to help identify the 30% of these older children that would continue to benefit from a booster seat. Rear seating should be promoted alongside booster seat use in the age group 4-12 years.
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Attachment
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Constraints and Statical Determinacy

