Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Post-kidney transplant surgical complications under new immunosuppressive regimens
F J Burgos1, J Pascual, C Quicios
1Urology Department, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. burgoss2000@yahoo.es
Abstract:
New immunosuppressive regimens have decreased acute rejection rates after kidney transplant. However, the use of these new agents has modified the profile of surgical complications. We compared the incidence of surgical complications in relation with the use of three types of drugs: calcineurin inhibitors, antiproliferative agents, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. This retrospective study included 359 cadaveric recipients who received an allograft between 1997 and 2004. The mean age was 54 years. The prevalence of diabetes was 8.5% and that of obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) was 15.4%. The mean follow-up time was 44 +/- 5.6 months. The regimen most frequently used was tacrolimus (TACRO), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (PRED) (n = 172), followed by TACRO-PRED (n = 49), cyclosporine (CSA) and MMF and PRED (n = 41), and CSA-azathioprine (AZA) and PRED (n = 24). A surgical complication was considered to be any type of event during the first year, although minimal, directly related to surgery. The rate of surgical complications was 34.8% (122/350). Collections and bleeding were higher in CSA than in TACRO regimens, 12% versus 3.8% (P < .05) and 11.5% versus 3% (P = .002), respectively. The incidence of lymphoceles was higher in regimens with than without mTOR inhibitors: 16% versus 3.7% (P = .012). The incidence of surgical complications was not influenced by the use of MMF or diabetes. In conclusion, the use of mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens leads to a higher incidence of lymphoceles, while the use of MMF does not increase the incidence of surgical complications.
Insights
New immunosuppressive drugs impact kidney transplant surgical complications. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors increase lymphocele risk, while mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) does not affect surgical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplant Surgery
- Immunosuppression
Background:
- Modern immunosuppressive regimens have reduced acute kidney transplant rejection.
- These newer agents, however, alter the landscape of post-surgical complications.
- Understanding these shifts is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of surgical complications based on different immunosuppressive drug classes.
- Specifically examining calcineurin inhibitors, antiproliferative agents, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors.
- To identify specific drug regimens associated with increased surgical risks.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 359 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients.
- Data collected from transplants performed between 1997 and 2004.
- Surgical complications were defined as any event within the first year post-transplant directly related to surgery.
Main Results:
- Overall surgical complication rate was 34.8%.
- Cyclosporine (CSA)-based regimens showed higher rates of collections and bleeding compared to tacrolimus (TACRO)-based regimens.
- Regimens including mTOR inhibitors were associated with a significantly higher incidence of lymphoceles (16% vs. 3.7%).
Conclusions:
- Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor-based immunosuppression is linked to an increased risk of lymphocele formation after kidney transplantation.
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use did not significantly influence the overall incidence of surgical complications.
- Immunosuppressive drug selection requires careful consideration of potential surgical complication profiles.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications

