Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
Published on: November 14, 2025
Breast MR imaging in the diagnostic setting
1Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. schnall@oasis.rad.upenn.edu
Abstract:
The role of MR imaging as an adjunct in the diagnostic evaluation of findings on mammography or clinical examination continues to evolve. Clearly, the use of MR imaging to evaluate all suspicious screening findings is not reasonable or effective. In particular, the role of MR imaging in the setting of mammographic microcalcifications is limited. MR imaging may be used in cases of one or more mammographically detected masses or asymmetric density in an effort to avoid biopsy. Optimized MR imaging technique; careful mammography, ultrasound, and MR imaging correlation; and adherence to interpretation guidelines are important to avoid false-negative diagnoses.
Insights
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is evolving as a diagnostic tool alongside mammography. Its use is limited for microcalcifications but can help avoid biopsies for mammographic masses or asymmetric densities.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging's role in breast cancer diagnostics is expanding.
- Its application requires careful consideration alongside mammography and clinical breast exams.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define the current role and limitations of MR imaging in evaluating mammographic findings.
- To highlight optimal techniques and interpretation guidelines for accurate diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical guidelines on MR imaging in breast diagnostics.
- Correlation of MR imaging findings with mammography, ultrasound, and clinical data.
Main Results:
- MR imaging is not recommended for all suspicious screening findings or mammographic microcalcifications.
- It can be valuable for evaluating mammographically detected masses or asymmetric densities to potentially avoid biopsy.
Conclusions:
- Optimized MR imaging techniques and correlation with other modalities are crucial.
- Adherence to interpretation guidelines is essential to prevent false-negative diagnoses and ensure appropriate patient management.
More Related Videos
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
12:23Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
Published on: August 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...