Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is belief reasoning automatic?

Ian A Apperly1, Kevin J Riggs, Andrew Simpson

  • 1School of Psychiatry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. i.a.apperly@bham.ac.uk

Psychological Science
|November 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phloiokeratosis is a new ichthyosiform hyperkeratotic cornification disorder in dogs with SUV39H1 variants.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Mindreading as asynchronous coordination: The MAC account of theory of mind performance, and individual differences.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Predicting Attrition in a Public Nutrition Education Program: A Machine Learning Approach.

Journal of nutrition education and behavior·2026
Same author

Atopy, asthma symptoms and eosinophilic airway inflammation in British woodworkers.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2025
Same author

What makes social abilities sophisticated? Not recursive mentalising.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Radiation Therapy in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2025
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Retributive Sentiments Track Both Deterrent and Compensatory Concerns in a Small-Scale Society and a WEIRD Sample.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Adults do not automatically infer beliefs. In a false-belief task, slower responses to unexpected belief questions suggest belief ascription is not automatic, unlike tracking reality.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Social Cognition

Background:

  • Theory of Mind (ToM) enables understanding of mental states like beliefs and desires.
  • Inferences about mental states are crucial for social interaction and cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the automaticity of belief reasoning, a core component of Theory of Mind.
  • To determine if adults spontaneously ascribe beliefs to others without explicit instruction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an incidental false-belief task with adult participants.
  • Measured response times to questions about an object's actual location versus another person's believed location.
  • Manipulated task instructions to assess the impact of explicit belief tracking.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Participants responded more slowly to unexpected questions about another person's belief compared to questions about the object's real location.
  • Response times to belief and reality questions were similar when participants were explicitly instructed to track beliefs.
  • This indicates that belief ascription is not an automatic process.

Conclusions:

  • Adults do not automatically ascribe beliefs to agents.
  • Belief reasoning requires cognitive resources and is not a default, effortless process.
  • Findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms underlying Theory of Mind and social cognition.