Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular
Paul S Chan1, Theodore Chow, Dean Kereiakes
1Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. paulchan@umich.edu
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease. This study confirms ICDs
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are proven to reduce mortality in primary prevention trials for patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction.
- The generalizability of these findings to real-world clinical practice requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in reducing mortality in a real-world clinical setting.
- To assess the impact of ICDs on all-cause mortality and arrhythmia-related mortality in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter cohort study included 770 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%) and no history of ventricular arrhythmia.
- Of the participants, 395 (52%) received ICDs, with a mean follow-up of 27 months.
- Cox proportional hazards analyses, including propensity score analysis, were used to control for clinical predictors of death and arrhythmic events.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving ICDs showed significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.86).
- The reduction in all-cause mortality was primarily driven by a significant decrease in arrhythmia-related mortality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73).
- No significant differences in cardiovascular nonarrhythmic or noncardiovascular mortality were observed between groups. Baseline risk for life-threatening arrhythmic events was similar between ICD and non-ICD groups.
Conclusions:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) demonstrate effectiveness in reducing all-cause and arrhythmia-related mortality in clinical practice.
- The observed mortality reduction in real-world settings aligns with findings from primary prevention trials.
Background:
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown in primary prevention efficacy trials to reduce mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. To investigate the generalizabilty of this mortality reduction, we examined the effectiveness of ICDs in clinical practice.
Methods:
We developed a prospective multicenter cohort of 770 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or =35%) and without a history of ventricular arrhythmia, of whom 395 (52%) received ICDs. Mean +/- SD follow-up was 27 +/- 12 months. We assessed the degree to which ICDs decreased mortality risk using Cox proportional hazards analyses that controlled for clinical predictors of death, receipt of ICD (a propensity score analysis), and predictors of arrhythmic death (including electrophysiologic variables).
Results:
Multivariate Cox analyses showed that those with ICDs had significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.86). This mortality reduction was mediated through dramatically lower arrhythmia-related mortality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73), with no significant effect on cardiovascular nonarrhythmic (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.34-1.96) and noncardiovascular (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.29-2.05) mortality. No differences were found between the ICD and non-ICD groups for a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, appropriate ICD shocks, or documented symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, which suggests that the 2 groups had similar baseline risk for life-threatening arrhythmic events (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.45).
Conclusion:
In clinical practice, ICDs appear to reduce all-cause and arrhythmic rates of mortality at levels similar to those found in primary prevention trials.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
