Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Individual differences in responses to provocation and frequent victimization by peers
Kelly M Champion1, Daniel L Clay
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Child Development and Family Studies Research Center, Arizona State University at the West Campus, PO Box 37100, Phoenix, AZ 85308-7100, USA. kelly.champion@asu.edu
Child Psychiatry and Human Development
|November 15, 2006
Summary
Peer victimization is linked to aggressive responses, especially when children feel angry and motivated to retaliate. These emotion processes, particularly anger and retaliation motivation, are key factors in aggressive intentions and victimization frequency among school-aged children.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Peer victimization is a significant concern in school environments.
- Understanding the psychological factors influencing aggressive responses to provocation is crucial for intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between peer victimization and aggressive intentions in response to provocation.
- To investigate the roles of anger arousal and retaliatory motivation in this association.
- To explore gender differences in these emotion processes.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study with 506 school-aged children (260 males, 246 females).
- Assessed peer victimization, anger arousal, retaliatory motivation, and aggressive intentions.
- Statistical analyses to determine associations and mediating roles of emotion processes.
Main Results:
- Higher anger arousal and retaliatory motivation were positively associated with aggressive intentions and victimization frequency.
- Aggressive intentions were mediated by subjective anger and motivation to retaliate.
- The influence of emotion processes on aggressive intentions was more pronounced in boys than girls.
- Motivation significantly predicted aggressive intentions in non-bullying participants.
Conclusions:
- Anger and retaliatory motivation are key factors linking peer victimization to aggressive responses.
- Interventions should incorporate anger management strategies to improve school climate and reduce victimization.
- Addressing emotion regulation is vital for preventing psychopathology in victims.
Related Concept Videos
02:04Bullying
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
01:28Adler's Individual Psychology
Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over unconscious...
01:23Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...