Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics, access, and care.

David T Ozar1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA. dozar@luc.edu

Journal of Dental Education
|November 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical thinking and practice in the healthcare professions.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same author

Virtue and care ethics & humanism in medical education: a scoping review.

BMC medical education·2022
Same author

Learning about Professional Ethics from Inter-Professional Dialogue.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2021
Same author

Nephrologists' professional ethics in dialysis practices.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2012
Same author

The future of dental ethics: Part 1. What to hope for and the challenge of getting there.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2008
Same author

Basic oral health needs: A public priority.

Journal of dental education·2006

Understanding differing views on oral health care access is crucial. The health professions view it as an ethical commitment, while public culture often equates health needs with mere desires.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Sociology of Health
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Contemporary American society exhibits divergent perspectives on healthcare access and patient care.
  • A significant gap exists between the ethical obligations perceived by health professionals and the public's understanding of health needs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the contrasting viewpoints on healthcare access and care prevalent in American society.
  • To analyze the ethical implications arising from the disparity between professional and public perceptions of oral health needs.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of ethical frameworks within health professions.
  • Examination of public cultural attitudes towards health needs and desires.
  • Conceptual exploration of the differing understandings of 'care' and 'access'.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Health professions approach access and care as an ethical imperative tied to patient needs.
  • Public culture often frames health needs as comparable to any other unmet desire, diminishing their ethical significance.
  • A substantial disconnect is identified between these two perspectives.

Conclusions:

  • Recognizing the chasm between professional ethics and public perception is vital for discussing oral health care access.
  • Addressing this disparity is essential for advancing equitable and ethically sound oral healthcare policies.
  • Bridging the gap requires a nuanced understanding of societal values concerning health and well-being.