Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A population coding account for systematic variation in saccadic dead time.

Casimir J H Ludwig1, John W Mildinhall, Iain D Gilchrist

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. c.ludwig@bristol.ac.uk

Journal of Neurophysiology
|November 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Live music enhances self-reported audience immersion and physiological synchrony compared to live-streaming.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Slower rates of prism adaptation but intact aftereffects in patients with early to mid-stage Parkinson's disease" [Neuropsychologia, 189, (2023) Epub 2023: 108681].

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

TraceLAB: A MATLAB Toolbox for Interindividual Synchrony Analysis of Facial Expression and Head Movement Data Acquired via Trace.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Aging and motor adaptation: Increased movement variability, slowing rates of adaptation, and smaller aftereffects.

Psychology and aging·2026
Same author

Visuomotor adaptation and savings to constant and varying visual feedback delays in a driving simulator.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Disentangling decision uncertainty and motor noise in curved movement trajectories.

Journal of vision·2025

The dead time for saccades, the period before movement execution, remains constant despite changes in saccade latency. However, dead time increases with target separation, explained by a stochastic accumulator model.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Oculomotor Systems
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Movement programming involves a commitment point, after which an action is executed regardless of new information, termed 'dead time' for saccades.
  • Understanding saccadic dead time variability is crucial for comprehending oculomotor decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the variability of saccadic dead time in response to changes in saccade latency and target configuration.
  • To test the predictions of a stochastic accumulator model for oculomotor decision mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a double-step paradigm to examine saccadic dead time.
  • Experiment 1 manipulated saccade latency by varying fixation point presence.
  • Experiment 2 altered the spatiotemporal separation between sequential visual targets.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Decreasing saccade latency did not affect dead time, despite a significant gap effect.
  • Dead time increased with increasing target separation, eventually plateauing.
  • A stochastic accumulator model accurately predicted these findings.

Conclusions:

  • Saccadic dead time is invariant to changes in overall saccade latency.
  • Target separation influences dead time, consistent with population coding assumptions in the stochastic accumulator model.
  • The model explains the gap effect via baseline activity changes, without altering dead time.