Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Planar Rigid-Body Motion

Planar Rigid-Body Motion

Understanding the movement of a rigid body in planar motion involves recognizing that every particle within this body is traversing a path that maintains a consistent distance from a specific plane. This concept is fundamental in the study of physics and mechanical engineering, and it allows us to comprehend better how objects move in space.
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the drone...

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components

Curvilinear motion characterizes the movement of a particle or object along a curved path, notably evident when envisioning a car navigating a winding road. If the car starts at point A, its position vector is established within a fixed frame of reference, where the ratio of the position vector to its magnitude signifies the unit vector pointing in the position vector's direction.
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the time...

Coplanar Forces

Coplanar Forces

Consider an object upon which multiple forces are acting. If the lines of action of each force lie within the same plane, the system can be considered coplanar. The Cartesian vector form can be used to resolve each force into its respective components. For a coplanar system, the system will be in equilibrium if each component of the resultant force equals zero and the resultant force on the system is zero. If the sum of the forces is not equal to zero, then the object will not be in equilibrium...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Automated qualitative and quantitative assessment of posterior capsule opacification by Automated Quantification of After-Cataract II (AQUA II) system.

BMC ophthalmology·2019

Same author

Dynamic Scene Recognition with Complementary Spatiotemporal Features.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2016

Same author

Generic object recognition with boosting.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2006

Same author

Comparison of 4 methods for quantifying posterior capsule opacification.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2003

Same author

Removal of reflections in the photographic assessment of PCO by fusion of digital retroillumination images.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2002

Same author

Reproducibility of standardized retroillumination photography for quantification of posterior capsule opacification.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2002

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Robust pose estimation from a planar target.

Gerald Schweighofer¹, Axel Pinz

¹Institute of Electrical Measurement and Measurement Signal Processing, Graz University of Technology, Kopernikusgasse, Graz, Austria. gerald.schweighofer@tugraz.at

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

|November 17, 2006

Summary

Camera pose estimation from planar targets often suffers from ambiguities. This study reveals two distinct error minima, even with wide-angle lenses, and introduces a novel algorithm for unique and robust pose determination.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Computer Vision
Robotics
Photogrammetry

Background:

Camera pose estimation is crucial for applications like augmented reality and robotics.
Existing real-time algorithms for pose estimation from planar targets often exhibit ambiguities.
These ambiguities can lead to inaccurate camera positioning and tracking.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the pose ambiguity in perspective camera pose estimation from planar targets.
To provide a comprehensive interpretation of the dual-solution ambiguity.
To develop a novel algorithm for unique and robust camera pose estimation.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the error function for pose estimation from coplanar points.
Derivation of an analytical solution to identify the second, ambiguous minimum.
Development of a new algorithm leveraging the analytical solution for disambiguation.

Main Results:

Pose ambiguities, manifesting as two distinct local minima in the error function, are confirmed to exist even for wide-angle lenses and close-range targets.
A comprehensive interpretation and analytical solution for the second minimum are derived.
The proposed algorithm demonstrates superior performance compared to four state-of-the-art methods in experimental evaluations.

Conclusions:

The identified pose ambiguity is inherent in planar target-based camera pose estimation.
The developed analytical solution and algorithm effectively resolve this ambiguity, enabling unique and robust pose estimation.
This advancement has significant implications for improving the reliability of camera tracking systems.