Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

06:58
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Addressing the underperformance of faculty and staff
Carole Kenner1, Jana L Pressler
1College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117, USA. Carole-Kenner@ouhsc.edu
Nurse Educator
|November 17, 2006
Summary
New academic nursing leaders often lack preparation for dean roles. This guide offers practical survival tips for deans and aspiring leaders, covering contracts, faculty, teams, and organizational agility.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Leadership
- Academic Administration
Background:
- Many newly appointed nursing deans, assistant deans, and interim deans possess insufficient formal education, experience, or background for their executive roles.
- This gap in preparedness can hinder their effectiveness in academic and administrative responsibilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide practical guidance and survival tips for new and aspiring nursing deans.
- To address common challenges and opportunities faced by academic nursing executive teams.
Main Methods:
- The authors, both experienced deans, draw upon their personal insights and practical experiences.
- The content focuses on actionable advice for navigating key administrative functions.
Main Results:
- Key areas addressed include executive contract negotiation, securing faculty lines, and building high-performing work teams.
- Strategies for managing challenging employees and developing adaptable organizational structures are discussed.
- The importance of responding to evolving healthcare delivery, consumer, and community needs is emphasized.
Conclusions:
- New nursing leaders can benefit from practical, experience-based strategies to effectively manage their roles.
- Proactive approaches to administrative challenges are crucial for successful nursing leadership in academia.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Negative and Positive Feedback
Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
Compensation Mechanisms
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Halo Effect
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...