Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Adding pharmacogenetics information to drug labels: lessons learned
Susanne B Haga1, Kenneth E Thummel, Wylie Burke
1Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. susanne.haga@duke.edu
Abstract:
The US Food and Drug Administration approved a revised package insert for two cancer drugs to include information about the increased risk of severe adverse events owing to enzyme deficiencies caused by genetic variants. The label revisions stopped short of recommending or requiring pharmacogenetic testing prior to or following an adverse event. Despite (or because of) the lack of specific recommendations, we believe the actions taken by US Food and Drug Administration will have implications for pharmacogenetics research, clinical integration, and other policy considerations. We review the reasons behind the cautious label changes and discuss some of the lessons that can be learned from these experiences.
Insights
The US Food and Drug Administration updated cancer drug labels with genetic variant information. This cautious approach impacts pharmacogenetics research and clinical integration, despite not mandating genetic testing.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacogenomics
- Oncology
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised drug labels for two cancer medications.
- Labels now include information on increased severe adverse event risks linked to genetic variants affecting enzyme deficiencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the FDA's cautious approach in updating drug labels regarding pharmacogenetic information.
- To discuss the implications of these label changes on pharmacogenetics research, clinical practice, and policy.
Main Methods:
- Review of FDA label revisions for specific cancer drugs.
- Analysis of the rationale behind the limited recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing.
- Discussion of potential impacts on the field of pharmacogenomics.
Main Results:
- FDA approved revised labels for two cancer drugs, noting genetic variant-related adverse event risks.
- The revisions did not mandate or recommend pharmacogenetic testing, reflecting a cautious regulatory stance.
Conclusions:
- The FDA's cautious label updates have significant implications for pharmacogenetics.
- Lessons learned from this regulatory action can inform future integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical practice and policy development.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Overview
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
