Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides

Estimation of k and V_D of Aminoglycosides

Aminoglycosides are a class of antibiotics used to treat various bacterial infections. Clinicians must determine the elimination rate constant (k) and volume of distribution (VD) to optimize therapeutic efficacy and minimize toxicity. The k value represents the rate at which the drug is removed from the body, and the VD reflects the degree to which the drug distributes into body tissues. Accurately estimating these parameters allows healthcare professionals to tailor drug dosing to individual...

Distance Corrections

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

ATR inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to cytotoxic and immunogenic effects of X-ray and carbon ion irradiation.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026

Same author

PARP7 inhibitors enhance the immunogenic effects of radiation in pancreatic cancer cells.

Molecular therapy. Oncology·2026

Same author

Calculating biological dose distributions in hadrontherapy using GATE: the BioDose actor.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same author

A probabilistic framework for risk-bounded patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy based on measured and calculated gamma pass rates.

Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik·2026

Same author

A commemoration and appreciation of Professor Ben Mijnheer.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026

Same author

Assessing the technical capability of a room- and a gantry-mounted kV imaging device for intra-fractional fluoroscopy during stereotactic lung radiotherapy at a C-arm linear accelerator.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Pencil kernel correction and residual error estimation for quality-index-based dose calculations.

Tufve Nyholm¹, Jörgen Olofsson, Anders Ahnesjö

¹Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. tufve.nyholm@radfys.umu.se

Physics in Medicine and Biology

|November 18, 2006

Summary

This study improved photon beam dose calculations by correcting a pencil kernel model, reducing systematic errors and accurately predicting remaining random errors in radiation therapy.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology
Computational Dosimetry

Background:

Pencil kernel models are used for photon beam dose calculations in radiation therapy.
Previous models exhibited systematic errors in dose calculations.
Accurate dose calculation is crucial for effective radiation therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantify errors in dose calculations using a published pencil kernel model.
To derive a correction for the pencil kernel model to minimize systematic errors.
To model residual errors and validate the improved method.

Main Methods:

Utilized experimental data from 593 photon beams.
Developed and applied a kernel correction to address systematic dose calculation errors.
Modeled residual errors using kernel model uncertainty.
Validated the corrected model against independent measurements.

Main Results:

The derived kernel correction successfully removed significant systematic errors.
Residual errors for individual beams were adequately modeled.
The proposed method demonstrated no significant systematic error in independent tests.
Random errors were accurately predicted by the uncertainty model.

Conclusions:

The corrected pencil kernel model significantly improves the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations.
The method provides a reliable way to estimate uncertainties in dose calculations.
This advancement enhances the precision and safety of radiation therapy planning.