Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Lisa D Sanders1, David Poeppel

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. lsanders@psych.umass.edu

Neuropsychologia
|November 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constituent-constrained word prediction during language comprehension.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Attention modulates the cortical representation of speech sounds in the spatial release from informational masking.

Auditory perception & cognition·2026
Same author

Mu rhythm motor-auditory delay in imagined speech mirrors overt speech timing.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Phonetic cue weighting as auditory feature-based selective attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Geometric properties of musical scales constitute a representational primitive in melodic processing.

iScience·2025
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Auditory processing distinguishes between local and global patterns using temporal cues, not just pitch. Event-related potentials show differential brain activity for local versus global auditory information.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual processing demonstrates clear distinctions between local and global feature analysis.
  • Prior auditory research has mainly explored music or frequency-based processing, not temporal aspects.
  • Understanding auditory local-global processing is key to determining if scale of detail is a general brain organizational principle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if temporal aspects of auditory stimuli, rather than frequency, define local and global processing.
  • To compare auditory local-global processing with established visual processing hierarchies.
  • To examine brain activity using event-related potentials (ERPs) during auditory local-global discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged pitch changes in short (40 ms) tones forming longer (500 ms) auditory patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Local (short-term) and global (long-term) pitch changes were independently manipulated.
  • Behavioral data (accuracy, reaction time) and electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Global auditory judgments were performed more accurately and faster than local judgments.
    • Asymmetric interference patterns were observed, influenced by the magnitude of pitch change.
    • Event-related potentials (ERPs) showed differential processing for local versus global auditory information, mirroring visual studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Temporal dynamics of auditory stimuli effectively differentiate local and global processing.
    • Auditory local-global processing appears to involve distinct neural pathways, potentially in ventral and dorsal areas.
    • While lateralization was not evident, differential processing supports scale of detail as a general brain principle.