Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020
Lung cancer: computerized quantification of tumor response--initial results
Binsheng Zhao1, Lawrence H Schwartz, Chaya S Moskowitz
1Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA. zhaob@mskcc.org
Semiautomated tumor segmentation using computed tomography (CT) more accurately quantifies lung cancer response than traditional measurements. This method identifies more patients with significant tumor volume changes, improving treatment assessment.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging Science
- Oncology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Accurate assessment of tumor response is crucial for guiding lung cancer treatment.
- Traditional unidimensional and bidimensional measurements may not fully capture volumetric changes.
- Advancements in imaging analysis offer potential for more precise tumor response quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate a semiautomated algorithm for quantifying tumor response in lung cancer patients.
- To compare the efficacy of tumor volume calculation versus traditional measurements (unidimensional and bidimensional) using thin-section CT.
- To assess tumor response or progression by analyzing changes in tumor volume and other parameters.
Main Methods:
- A semiautomated three-dimensional lung cancer segmentation algorithm was developed and applied to CT scans.
- Tumor volume, greatest diameter (unidimensional), and product of diameters (bidimensional) were calculated.
- 15 non-small cell lung cancer patients' scans before and after gefitinib treatment were analyzed; Exact McNemar tests compared measurement techniques.
Main Results:
- The algorithm accurately segmented 14 of 15 tumors, with one requiring manual adjustment.
- Semiautomated volume analysis identified significantly more patients with at least 20% tumor volume change (73%) compared to unidimensional (7%) and bidimensional (27%) measurements.
- Higher thresholds also showed greater sensitivity with volume: 47% of patients had >=30% volume change versus 0% (unidimensional) and 13% (bidimensional).
Conclusions:
- Semiautomated tumor segmentation and volume calculation provide a more sensitive method for assessing lung cancer response.
- This technique identifies a greater number of patients experiencing significant tumor volume changes (>=20% and >=30%) compared to traditional methods.
- Volumetric assessment using CT offers improved accuracy in quantifying tumor response or progression in lung cancer patients.
More Related Videos
11:31Using Micro-computed Tomography for the Assessment of Tumor Development and Follow-up of Response to Treatment in a Mouse Model of Lung Cancer
Published on: May 20, 2016
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018