Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Baroda development screening test for infants.

A T Phatak1, B Khurana

  • 1Department of Child Development, MS University of Baroda.

Indian Pediatrics
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Horse kick related injury: Significance of the line of impact.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2015
Same author

LIM proteins: association with the actin cytoskeleton.

Protoplasma·2002
Same author

Evidence of bovine non-group A rotavirus in diarrhoeic neonatal calves in India.

The Veterinary record·2001
Same author

The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed?

Perception·2000
Same author

Not to be and then to be: visual representation of ignored unfamiliar faces.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2000
Same author

Risk factors for duodenal ulcer in north India.

Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation·1999
Same journal

Microbial Conversations Between the Gut and Urinary Tract: Emerging Implications for Kidney and Urinary Tract Diseases.

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and Associated Social Factors of Prediabetes in Children and Adolescents in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Early Intrapleural Fibrinolytic Therapy, Versus Administration After Failure of Intercostal Drainage in Children with Empyema Thoracis: A Systematic Review.

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Can Nebulized Epinephrine Prevent Extubation Failure in Neonates?

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic Respiratory Stabilization During Neonatal Intubation-What Does this Trial Add for Indian NICUs?

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Universal Early-Life Screening in India: Time for a National Integrated Strategy.

Indian pediatrics·2026
See all related articles

A new screening test, adapted from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), offers a quick method for assessing infant motor-mental development in community surveys. This tool aids health workers in identifying potential developmental delays early.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Assessing infant motor-mental development is crucial for early intervention.
  • Existing comprehensive scales can be time-consuming for widespread community surveys.
  • A need exists for a rapid, reliable screening tool for health workers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and describe a simple, quick screening test for infant motor-mental development.
  • To adapt items from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) using Baroda norms.
  • To facilitate use by health workers in community surveys and office practice.

Main Methods:

  • Selection of items from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID).
  • Adaptation of the selected items with Baroda norms for a screening test.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of administration procedures for community surveys and clinical settings.
  • Comparison with the Denver Development Screening Test (DDST).
  • Main Results:

    • A validated screening test for infant motor-mental development was created.
    • The test is designed for rapid administration by health workers.
    • The screening test effectively identifies infants needing further detailed assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Routine use of this screening test is recommended for monitoring child development.
    • It aids in identifying infants with potential developmental delays for referral.
    • The test supports early detection and intervention for better developmental outcomes.