Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. K.Ingels@kno.umcn.nl
Objective:
To measure the effect of columellar struts and cephalic trim on tip projection and tip rotation using digitized photographs.
Methods:
Using photographs of 62 patients who underwent external rhinoplasty, we retrospectively analyzed nasal tip projection (the Goode method) and rotation (nasolabial angle) before and after surgery. A cartilaginous strut was used in 36 patients, whereas 26 patients did not receive a strut. Patients were categorized into 4 subgroups, depending on the placement of a strut (placement, strut+ vs nonplacement, strut-) and the removal of the cephalic margin (removal, cephalic+ vs nonremoval, cephalic-) of the lateral crus: strut-/cephalic-, n = 17; strut+/cephalic-, n = 23; strut-/cephalic+, n = 9; strut+/cephalic+, n = 12.
Results:
Nasal tip projection, measured with the Goode method, increased from 0.58 to 0.60 (P = .02) in the strut+ group; in the strut- group, nasal tip projection did not change significantly. Nasolabial angle increased from 93.96 degrees to 100.92 degrees in the strut+/cephalic- group and from 88.30 degrees to 95.06 degrees in the strut+/cephalic+ group. Removal of the cephalic margin alone (strut-/cephalic+) hardly affected tip rotation (P = .05).
Conclusions:
The external rhinoplasty approach did not lead to a decrease in nasal tip projection. A cartilaginous strut slightly increased nasal tip projection and also increased nasal tip rotation. This effect was accentuated by the removal of the cephalic margin of the lateral crus.
