Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Random number generator or sewer water quality model?

P Willems1

  • 1Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Hydraulics Laboratory, Kasteelpark Arenberg 40, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium. Patrick.Willems@bwk.kuleuven.ac.be

Water Science and Technology : a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
|November 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Integrated urban drainage models show that complex simulations are not always more accurate than simple frequency distributions for assessing environmental impacts. Focus should shift to long-term simulations and parsimonious model validation for credible impact assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of size and comminution of the posterior malleolus fragment on gait in trimalleolar ankle fractures.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2021
Same author

Gait analysis and functional outcome in patients after Lisfranc injury treatment.

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2018
Same author

Vertical ground reaction forces in patients after calcaneal trauma surgery.

Gait & posture·2017
Same author

Cowden syndrome and the associated Lhermitte-Duclos disease--Case presentation.

Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska·2015
Same author

Green-blue water in the city: quantification of impact of source control versus end-of-pipe solutions on sewer and river floods.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2014
Same author

Modelling the erosive effects of sewer flushing using different sediment transport formulae.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2014
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Resource Management
  • Computational Hydrology

Background:

  • Integrated urban drainage models are crucial for environmental impact assessments of sewer systems, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and receiving rivers.
  • Current water quality modelling faces significant uncertainty, potentially undermining the credibility of environmental impact assessments.
  • Linking sewer emission models with treatment and river submodels is essential but challenging due to inherent complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of integrated urban drainage models compared to simpler methods for environmental impact assessment.
  • To investigate the impact of model complexity on the reliability of water quality predictions.
  • To identify key factors for improving the credibility and utility of water quality modelling in impact assessments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of an integrated model for a combined sewer-WWTP-river system.
  • Comparison of integrated model outputs with random simulations based on emission concentration frequency distributions.
  • Analysis of model accuracy and the influence of simulation duration and model parsimony.

Main Results:

  • The integrated urban drainage model did not yield more accurate results than random simulations of emission concentrations from a frequency distribution.
  • Model sophistication in water quality modelling was found to be less critical than previously assumed.
  • Environmental impact assessment often relies on statistical, rather than real-time, model outputs.

Conclusions:

  • The accuracy of integrated models is not necessarily superior to simpler statistical approaches for environmental impact assessment.
  • Future efforts should prioritize long-term simulations, the use of parsimonious models, and validation based on concentration frequencies.
  • Improving the credibility of environmental impact assessment requires a shift in focus from model detail to robust validation and statistical analysis.