Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Osteoinduction with COLLOSS, COLLOSS E, and GFm.

W E Huffer1, J J Benedict, R Rettenmaier

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA.

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
|November 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-glycosylated BMP-2 can induce ectopic bone formation at lower concentrations compared to glycosylated BMP-2.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2012
Same author

Healing of bone defects in the goat mandible, using COLLOSS E and beta-tricalciumphosphate.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2009
Same author

Analytical assessment of the osteoinductive material COLLOSSE.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2009
Same author

The effect of combined application of TGFbeta-1, BMP-2, and COLLOSS E on the development of bone marrow derived osteoblast-like cells in vitro.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2007
Same author

Preliminary in vivo studies on the osteogenic potential of bone morphogenetic proteins delivered from an absorbable puttylike polymer matrix.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2000
Same author

Growth factors regulate expression of osteoblast-associated genes.

Journal of periodontology·1999
Same journal

Peptidomics in the Spotlight: Advanced Sample Treatment Techniques and Analytical Insights.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Methods for the Investigation of Protein-Ligands Interactions.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Sample Preparation Strategies for Microbial Cell Surface Proteomics: Integrating Shaving and Shotgun Approaches.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Sample Preparation for the Petroleum Industry: A Biocorrosion Case Study.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Proteomic and Functional Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles from Wild-Type and Lyn-Deficient Stromal Cells.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Analysis of Histone Sequence Variants and Post-translationally Modified Forms.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Both COLLOSS and COLLOSS E scaffolds contain bone-forming BMPs. COLLOSS E demonstrated higher potency and promoted more membranous bone formation compared to COLLOSS and GFm in ectopic rat models.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Orthopedic Research

Background:

  • Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are crucial for osteogenesis.
  • Scaffolds like COLLOSS and COLLOSS E are investigated for bone regeneration.
  • Understanding the comparative efficacy of different BMP delivery systems is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To confirm the osteo- and chondro-inductive potential of COLLOSS and COLLOSS E.
  • To quantify the relative bone-forming potency of COLLOSS and COLLOSS E compared to GFm.
  • To analyze the types of bone formation (endochondral vs. membranous) induced by these materials.

Main Methods:

  • Ectopic implantation in rat models to assess new bone formation.
  • Standardized implant sections analyzed for bone area quantification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of bone formation potency and type.

    • Main Results:

    • COLLOSS and COLLOSS E confirmed to possess osteo- and chondro-inductive BMPs.
    • COLLOSS E was 0.3 times as potent as GFm, and COLLOSS was 0.1 times as potent.
    • Membranous bone formation was more frequent with COLLOSS E, while endochondral bone formation was more frequent with GFm.

    Conclusions:

    • COLLOSS and COLLOSS E are effective osteo- and chondro-inductive materials.
    • COLLOSS E exhibits superior potency and a distinct bone formation profile compared to COLLOSS and GFm.
    • These findings contribute to the development of advanced bone regenerative therapies.