Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Geometry and bone density.

G Radetti1, F Rigon, G Tonini

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Regional Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. giorgio.radetti@asbz.it

Panminerva Medica
|November 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A low-dose multicomponent medication as a new approach in prevention and early add-on treatment of recurrent respiratory infections in children: a Delphi Consensus.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2024
Same author

Safety and effectiveness of a somatropin biosimilar in children requiring growth hormone treatment: second analysis of the PATRO Children study Italian cohort.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2020
Same author

The microRNA-29a Modulates Serotonin 5-HT7 Receptor Expression and Its Effects on Hippocampal Neuronal Morphology.

Molecular neurobiology·2019
Same author

Infantile swallowing: surgical meaning.

La Clinica terapeutica·2019
Same author

Evaluation of growth hormone response to GHRH plus arginine test in children with idiopathic short stature: role of peak time.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2018
Same author

Can Type 1 diabetes progression be halted? Possible role of high dose vitamin D and omega 3 fatty acids.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2017
Same journal

Circulating osteopontin and body composition in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.

Panminerva medica·2026
Same journal

Fluid de-resuscitation in critical illness: are we measuring the right endpoint?

Panminerva medica·2026
Same journal

A standardized Ferula supplement (Menotrack) to prevent symptoms in post-menopause: a 3-month supplement registry.

Panminerva medica·2026
Same journal

Impact of cardiogenic shock on outcomes in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Panminerva medica·2026
Same journal

Characteristics and outcomes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection versus Takotsubo Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Panminerva medica·2026
Same journal

Medical decluttering: what it is and why it is important.

Panminerva medica·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating bone development in children is crucial. This review compares bone assessment methods like DEXA and pQCT, explaining how technique and individual growth influence results.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Bone development is a critical process in growing children, involving increases in length, size, and mineralization.
  • Accurate assessment of bone status is essential for monitoring growth and health.
  • Various techniques exist for bone evaluation, each with limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare different methods for assessing bone development in children.
  • To explain how bone structure and geometry impact the results of these assessments.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate bone evaluation techniques based on auxological characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established bone evaluation techniques including dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), ultrasound, and metacarpal index.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how auxological characteristics (e.g., age, sex, body composition) affect bone assessment outcomes.
  • Examination of the influence of bone geometry and structural changes on measurement accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Each bone evaluation method (DEXA, pQCT, ultrasound, metacarpal index) has unique advantages and disadvantages.
    • Results from bone assessments are significantly influenced by the chosen technique.
    • Individual auxological factors and evolving bone geometry critically affect measurement interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the interplay between assessment methods, bone structure, and individual growth is vital for accurate pediatric bone evaluation.
    • The choice of bone assessment technique should consider the specific auxological profile of the child.
    • Further research may refine these methods to account for developmental variations in bone geometry.