Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Philosophical errors and unintended harms in recrafting the foundation of counseling and psychotherapy: Commentary on Sue et al. (2024).

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

REDI, Set, Caution.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Epistemic cognition in medical education: a literature review.

International journal of medical education·2017
Same author

On the nature and purpose of public discourse.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2006
Same journal

Correction.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Development, validity, and reliability of the pre-attendance conference evaluator (PACE) tool for identifying predatory conferences.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Managing manuscripts with potential dual-use research of concern: A thematic analysis of life science journal policies.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Researching retraction: Do we need more rules or more honesty?

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Accountability in evidence syntheses: On the need for rigorous peer review and reporting guidelines.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies.

Accountability in research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement.

Elysa Koppelman-White1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Oakland University, 336 O'Dowd Hall, Rochester, MI 48309, USA. koppelma@oakland.edu

Accountability in Research
|November 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research misconduct is addressed by rules and ethics education. Rules have limited scope due to science

Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral Research

More Related Videos

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
07:59

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
07:59

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Scientific integrity and research ethics.
  • Sociology of science.
  • Science policy and regulation.

Background:

  • Research misconduct requires regulation through rules and ethics education.
  • The effectiveness of these responses depends on understanding the nature of scientific practice.
  • Current approaches may not adequately address the complexities of scientific research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the roles of rules and ethics education in responding to research misconduct.
  • To determine how the nature of science should shape these regulatory responses.
  • To identify necessary improvements in ethics education for researchers.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of scientific practice and its implications for regulation.
  • Critique of existing regulatory frameworks for research misconduct.
  • Evaluation of current ethics education models in science.

Main Results:

  • Rules for research misconduct must be limited in scope regarding covered behaviors and intent.
  • Ethics education should fill the gaps left by limited rules, focusing on theoretical concerns.
  • Current ethics education often falls short of addressing these theoretical gaps.

Conclusions:

  • Ethics education needs to emphasize theory and reach a broader audience.
  • Education should foster a discipline-specific, evolving standard of care.
  • Adapting ethics education to the evolving nature of science is crucial for effective misconduct prevention.