Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gaussian beams and minimum diffraction.

Alfredo Luis1

  • 1Departamento de Optica, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. alluis@fis.ucm.es

Optics Letters
|November 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase-space quantum Wiener-Khintchine theorem.

Optics letters·2022
Same author

Signal estimation and coherence: publisher's note.

Optics letters·2021
Same author

Signal estimation and coherence.

Optics letters·2021
Same author

Detector self-tomography.

Optics letters·2020
Same author

Coherence for vectorial waves and majorization.

Optics letters·2016
Same author

Majorization applied to diffraction.

Optics letters·2016

Different measures of diffraction yield conflicting results on optimal beam profiles. Gaussian beams do not always minimize diffraction or maximize quality when using Rényi entropy.

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Information Theory

Background:

  • Beam quality is crucial for applications like laser manipulation and imaging.
  • Gaussian beams are traditionally considered optimal due to minimal diffraction for a given width.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different diffraction measures on determining optimal beam profiles.
  • To re-evaluate the optimality of Gaussian beams under alternative diffraction metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of various diffraction measures, including standard deviation and Rényi entropy.
  • Analysis of beam profiles and their corresponding diffraction quantities.

Main Results:

  • Different diffraction measures lead to contradictory conclusions about the ideal beam profile.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Rényi entropy indicates that Gaussian beams do not achieve minimum diffraction or maximum quality.

    • Conclusions:

    • The choice of diffraction measure significantly influences the assessment of beam quality.
    • Gaussian beams may not be universally optimal, challenging established assumptions in beam optics.