Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A 'first stage' central performance drop in a Gabor luminance-modulation detection task.

Lothar Kehrer1, Cristina Meinecke

  • 1Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany. lothar.kehrer@uni-bielefeld.de

Spatial Vision
|November 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Top-down influence on bottom-up process: the familiarity effect modulates texture segmentation.

Vision research·2013
Same author

Spatial competition on the master-saliency map.

Frontiers in psychology·2013
Same author

Electrophysiological correlates of target eccentricity in texture segmentation.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2011
Same author

Texture segmentation: do the processing units on the saliency map increase with eccentricity?

Vision research·2010
Same authorSame journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same author

A central performance drop with luminance stimuli requiring spatial integration.

Perception & psychophysics·2007
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Visual perception of Gabor targets varies by spatial frequency. High frequencies are best detected centrally, while low frequencies peak eccentrically, supporting the mismatch hypothesis.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Human Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Visual sensitivity typically declines in peripheral vision.
  • Spatial frequency processing is a key aspect of visual perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how spatial frequency affects visual target detection at different retinal eccentricities.
  • To test the 'mismatch hypothesis' concerning visual processing.

Main Methods:

  • 20 participants detected backward masked Gabor targets at varying horizontal eccentricities.
  • Target stimuli modulated luminance with different spatial frequencies (0.5-7.0 c/deg).

Main Results:

  • High spatial frequency (7.0 c/deg) detection peaked centrally, decreasing peripherally.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Low spatial frequencies (0.5-1.0 c/deg) showed peak detection eccentrically, decreasing towards the center.
  • Confirmed peripheral sensitivity loss for high spatial frequencies and central loss for low spatial frequencies.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual sensitivity to spatial frequencies is not uniform across the visual field.
    • Findings support and extend the 'mismatch hypothesis' to first-stage visual stimuli.