Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
Published on: December 15, 2023
Effect of variability in assay bias and imprecision on external quality assessment bias and imprecision measures
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433. Robert_Hawkins@ttsh.com.sg
Background:
External quality assessment/proficiency testing programmes that report consensus means and coefficients of variations (CVs) are a potential source of information on assay bias and imprecision. This study examined the effect of variability in assay bias and imprecision on consensus means and CVs, using a computerized spreadsheet model.
Methods:
A model with varying assay bias (mean and standard deviation) and assay imprecision (mean and standard deviation) was developed using a MS Excel 2003 spreadsheet with a macro to generate pseudo-random numbers from a Gaussian distribution. The means, standard deviations and CVs of these data points were considered to simulate the consensus measures reported in external quality assessment testing programmes.
Results:
The simulated consensus CV was very sensitive to increases in assay bias variability, with greater effects at low levels of mean assay imprecision. Changes in assay imprecision variability had a much smaller effect on the simulated consensus CV, while the simulated consensus mean was relatively insensitive to any change in the other variables.
Conclusion:
Consensus imprecision measures from external quality assessment programmes are unreliable measures of assay imprecision. Consensus means are relatively unaffected by variability in assay bias and imprecision, and can be used as reliable measures of assay bias from a statistical standpoint.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Quality Assurance
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Random and Systematic Errors