Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling
Published on: September 15, 2017
C M Ogilvie1, P L Brown, M Matson
1Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
This study evaluated the use of selective parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) in patients with complicated hyperparathyroidism, including those with recurrent disease or a history of failed surgery. The researchers compared PVS results with those of other imaging techniques like ultrasound, MRI, CT, and sestamibi scans. They found that PVS provided useful localization information in most cases and was more accurate than other modalities when compared to histology. The study suggests that PVS may be a helpful diagnostic tool in experienced centers for managing complex cases of hyperparathyroidism.
Area of Science:
Background:
Accurate localization of abnormal parathyroid glands remains a challenge in managing complicated hyperparathyroidism. While various imaging modalities are used, their effectiveness varies. Prior research has shown that ultrasound, MRI, CT, and sestamibi scans have limited accuracy in certain cases. This gap motivated the exploration of alternative diagnostic approaches. No prior work had resolved how to best localize parathyroid pathology in patients with recurrent or familial disease. Selective parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) has been proposed as a potential solution. However, its role in clinical practice remains unclear. This uncertainty drove the need for a retrospective analysis of PVS outcomes. The study aimed to clarify PVS's utility in complex cases.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of selective parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) in patients with complicated hyperparathyroidism. Specifically, the researchers sought to compare PVS with other imaging modalities like ultrasound, MRI, CT, and sestamibi scans. The motivation stemmed from the limitations of existing diagnostic tools in complex cases. Patients with recurrent or persistent disease and familial syndromes often require more precise localization. The study focused on whether PVS could provide reliable preoperative localization. It also aimed to assess the curative outcomes following PVS-guided surgery. The goal was to determine if PVS could serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in this patient group. The results could help guide clinical decision-making in challenging cases.
Main Methods:
The study involved a retrospective analysis of 27 patients with complicated hyperparathyroidism over a 10-year period. Researchers collected data on preoperative imaging and PVS results. They compared PVS findings with surgical and histological outcomes. The study included patients with recurrent disease, persistent disease, or familial syndromes. Histology served as the gold standard for evaluating diagnostic accuracy. The team also reviewed the results of ultrasound, MRI, CT, and sestamibi scans. Outcomes were assessed based on concordance with histology and postoperative cure rates. The analysis focused on the diagnostic utility of PVS in this specific patient population.
Main Results:
Out of 25 patients who underwent surgery, PVS results were completely concordant with histology in 14 cases. Eighty-eight percent of patients achieved postoperative cure following PVS-guided surgery. Among 13 patients with a history of failed surgery, 9 achieved a curative outcome after further surgery. PVS provided useful positive or negative information in 19 out of 25 patients. When compared to other modalities, PVS had a 59% concordance with histology. Ultrasound scans had 39% concordance, sestamibi scans 36%, and MRI/CT scans only 17%. These findings suggest PVS may offer higher diagnostic accuracy in complex cases. The results support the use of PVS as an adjunct diagnostic tool in experienced centers.
Conclusions:
The study findings suggest that selective parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) may be a valuable diagnostic tool in managing complicated hyperparathyroidism. The authors propose that PVS provides more accurate localization than other imaging modalities in selected cases. The results indicate that PVS can yield useful diagnostic information in the majority of patients. The study supports the use of PVS as an adjunct to MRI/CT and sestamibi scans in complex cases. The authors note that PVS may be particularly helpful in patients with a history of failed surgery. The findings do not suggest that PVS is superior in all cases, but rather in specific clinical scenarios. The study emphasizes the importance of performing PVS in experienced centers. The authors conclude that PVS may improve surgical outcomes when used appropriately.
PVS results were completely concordant with surgical and histological findings in 14 out of 25 patients who underwent surgery.
PVS had 59% concordance with histology, compared to 39% for ultrasound, 36% for sestamibi scans, and 17% for MRI/CT scans.
PVS provided useful information in 12 of 13 patients referred after failed surgery, with 9 achieving postoperative cure.
Histology served as the gold standard for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of PVS and other imaging modalities.
Eighty-eight percent of patients who underwent surgery after PVS achieved postoperative cure.
The authors suggest that PVS may be a valuable adjunct to MRI/CT and sestamibi scans in selected patients with complicated hyperparathyroidism.