Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protein probabilities in shotgun proteomics: evaluating different estimation methods using a semi-random sampling

Xiaofang Xue1, Songfeng Wu, Zhongsheng Wang

  • 1Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.

Proteomics
|November 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards the construction of a virtual yeast.

Nature·2026
Same author

Targeting THOC2-Mediated mRNA Export Induces PARP Inhibitor Vulnerability in DNA Repair-Competent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

International journal of biological sciences·2026
Same author

Power and sample-size estimation in human microbiome research.

Med (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Two distinct causes contribute to the low efficiency of human pre-implantation development.

Cell·2026
Same author

π-SeqOmics: A Sequential Workflow for Genomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic, and Phosphoproteomic Profiling From Biopsy-Scale Samples.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same author

Multimodal clocks of human aging.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Identification of Novel Interacting Proteins of FUZ and GPR161.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Light-Induced Proteomic Changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Decade-Resolved Proteomic Profiling of Gastric Cancer FFPE Archives: Evaluating Storage-Associated Shifts and Signal Stability Over 50 Years.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Proteome-Scale Mining of Metal-Associated Proteins of Monkeypox Virus.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Optimized Sample Handling Minimizes Peptide Adsorption to Plastics to Enable High Sensitivity Evosep Based Chemical Proteomics.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Toward Predicting Pandemic Potential: A Comparative Analysis of Virus-Host Interactions Between Diverse Influenza A Viruses and the Human Innate Immune System.

Proteomics·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating protein probability calculation methods in proteomics is challenging. A new simulation model shows PROT_PROBE offers higher specificity than other methods like ProteinProphet.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Calculating protein probabilities is a critical yet difficult task in large-scale proteomic research.
  • Existing methods like ProteinProphet, PROT_PROBE, Poisson model, and two-peptide hits have varying approaches.
  • A lack of efficient comparative evaluation methods for these techniques on large datasets exists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel semi-random sampling model for simulating large-scale proteomic data.
  • To comparatively evaluate the performance of different protein probability estimation methods using simulated data.
  • To assess the impact of experimental factors on protein probability calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a semi-random sampling model to simulate proteomic datasets.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulated identified peptides from designed proteins and their cross-correlation scores.
  • Validated the model against experimental results from 18 control proteins.
  • Applied the model to a simulated human liver sample dataset.

    • Main Results:

    • The simulation model demonstrated consistency with experimental data.
    • ProteinProphet showed higher probabilities but lower specificity compared to actual data.
    • PROT_PROBE exhibited higher efficiency and specificity.
    • The Poisson model's predictions aligned well with real datasets; two-peptide hits were imprecise.
    • Protein identification probabilities correlated with spectra number, database size, and protein abundance.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed simulation model is effective for evaluating protein probability estimation methods.
    • PROT_PROBE emerges as a more specific and efficient method for large-scale proteomic analysis.
    • Experimental factors significantly influence the reliability of protein probability calculations.