Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Incremental validity of the typical intellectual engagement scale as predictor of different academic performance
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic1, Adrian Furnham, Phillip L Ackerman
1Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, London, UK. pss02tc@gold.ac.uk
Abstract:
The incremental validity of the Typical Intellectual Engagement (TIE) scale (Goff & Ackerman, 1992) as a predictor of academic performance (AP) was tested over and above other established determinants of AP, namely, psychometric g (as extracted from 5 cognitive ability tests) and the Big Five personality traits, assessed by the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992). One hundred four British students were tested on arrival to university, and AP measures were collected longitudinally throughout a 3-year period. TIE, g, and Conscientiousness were the highest correlates of AP. A series of multiple-hierarchical regressions showed that TIE had significant incremental validity (over and above g and the Big Five) in the prediction of AP. Implications are discussed in light of the investment theory of intellectual competence and the utility of self-report inventories as predictors of academic achievement.
Related Concept Videos
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Reliability and Validity
Biological Influences on Intelligence