Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Topical antibiotic ototoxicity: does it influence our practice?

E C Ho1, A Alaani, R Irving

  • 1Department of ENT Surgery, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK. euchinho@yahoo.co.uk

The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
|December 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ehrlichia canis rapid spread and possible enzooty in northern South Australia and distribution of its vector Rhipicephalus linnaei.

Australian veterinary journal·2022
Same author

Balance testing: does it make a difference?

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022
Same author

A report on quality-of-life outcomes following transmastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in a newly established service in a UK hospital.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022
Same author

The surgical management of bilateral facial paralysis: case report.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2018
Same author

Gorham-Stout disease of the temporal bone involving the temporomandibular joint.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2018
Same author

Audiological outcome of stapes surgery for far advanced cochlear otosclerosis.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2017

General practitioners and ENT specialists differ in managing discharging ears. Most doctors would use a non-ototoxic topical antibiotic for ear infections if available.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • General Practice
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Discharging ears are common conditions managed by both general practitioners (GPs) and Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialists.
  • Existing management strategies may vary between primary care and specialist settings.
  • Investigating these differences is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the management approaches for discharging ears between GPs and ENT specialists.
  • To identify specific differences in the use of topical antibiotics.
  • To assess the potential impact of a novel non-ototoxic topical antibiotic on treatment preferences.

Main Methods:

  • A postal questionnaire survey was conducted.
  • Participants included all GPs in the Birmingham area and UK-based ENT consultants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The survey focused on current practices and future treatment considerations for discharging ears.

    • Main Results:

    • For intact tympanic membranes, 99% of consultants and 90% of GPs favored topical antibiotics.
    • For perforated tympanic membranes, 97% of consultants used topical antibiotics versus only 43% of GPs, citing ototoxicity concerns.
    • A significant majority of both groups (93% consultants, 88% GPs) would consider a non-ototoxic topical antibiotic as first-line treatment.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant divergence exists in the management of discharging ears, particularly regarding topical antibiotic use with perforated tympanic membranes.
    • Fear of ototoxicity influences GPs' reluctance to use topical antibiotics in certain cases.
    • The introduction of an effective, non-ototoxic topical antibiotic could significantly alter current treatment paradigms for ear infections.