Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of context on diagnostic reasoning: A narrative synthesis of experimental findings.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
Same author

Does allowing access to electronic differential diagnosis support threaten the reliability of a licensing exam?

Medical education·2023
Same author

The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2022
Same author

Does a deep learning inventory predict knowledge transfer? Linking student perceptions to transfer outcomes.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2022
Same author

Intrinsic or Invisible? An Audit of CanMEDS Roles in Entrustable Professional Activities.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2022
Same author

Diagnostic reasoning in cardiovascular medicine.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

The relation between the minimally important difference and patient benefit.

Geoffrey R Norman1

  • 1Program for Educational Research and Development, McMaster University, Building T-13, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. norman@mcmaster.ca

COPD
|December 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The effect size of a treatment reliably predicts patient benefit, independent of the Minimally Important Difference (MID) threshold. This finding suggests effect size is a more robust measure for assessing treatment efficacy in clinical practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Determining clinical relevance of treatment effects on quality of life is crucial.
  • The anchor-based method, using Minimally Important Difference (MID), is a common approach.
  • The utility of MID in differentiating treatment benefits is questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between treatment effect size (ES), MID, and the likelihood of patient benefit.
  • To assess if MID is a meaningful criterion for treatment efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study using normal distributions to model patient benefit.
  • Calculated the proportion of benefiting patients for various ES and MID values.
  • Validated simulation results against empirical data from four respiratory disease studies.

Main Results:

  • A near-linear relationship was observed between ES and the likelihood of patient benefit.
  • This relationship was largely independent of the chosen MID value.
  • Simulation results showed excellent agreement with empirical data, even with moderate distribution skew.

Conclusions:

  • The proportion of patients benefiting from treatment can be accurately estimated from the effect size alone.
  • Effect size and anchor-based approaches provide equivalent information regarding treatment benefit.
  • The concept of MID as an absolute indicator of clinically important effects has limited utility.