Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Subjective assessment of backrest elevation: magnitude of error
Maria Angélica S Peterlini1, Patrícia K Rocha, Denise M Kusahara
1Nursing Department, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo City, Brazil.
Background:
Backrest elevation, defined as the angle of the backrest height above the horizontal position, is a common nursing intervention that is often used by subjective visual estimation in critically ill patients.
Objectives:
The aim of the study was to describe the magnitude of error during the subjective assessment of backrest elevation.
Methods:
This prospective study was conducted in a sample of 160 subjects: 97 registered nurses, 48 undergraduate nursing students, and 15 nursing assistants. Data were collected by recording the degrees of backrest elevation identified by the subjects through an individual random presentation of the selected study angles of 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 35 degrees, 40 degrees, and 45 degrees. A measurement instrument was developed for determination of the angles.
Results:
Of the 800 investigated angles, 14.9% were estimated accurately, 61.6% were overestimated, and 23.5% were underestimated, with an error average of 8 degrees (+/-13.5 degrees). It was determined that the larger the angle estimated, the greater the average error. A statically significant difference (P
Conclusion:
The results indicate that the subjective assessment of backrest angle may result in errors that may potentially compromise the patient's condition and supports the need for a more objective method for determining backrest angle.
Related Concept Videos
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
