Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

09:00
High Throughput Sequential ELISA for Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Published on: October 31, 2012
Analytical validation of commercially available methods for acute phase proteins quantification in pigs
F Tecles1, P Fuentes, S Martínez Subiela
1Animal Medicine and Surgery Department, Veterinary School, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, s/n 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Research in Veterinary Science
|December 5, 2006
Summary
This study validated commercial assays for porcine acute phase proteins (APPs) like haptoglobin (Hp) and C-reactive protein (CRP). While generally reliable, some assays showed variability with low concentrations or specific interfering substances.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary diagnostics
- Biochemical analysis
- Animal health monitoring
Background:
- Accurate quantification of acute phase proteins (APPs) is crucial for diagnosing inflammation and disease in pigs.
- Commercially available assays offer convenience but require validation for specific species and applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the performance of commercial assays for porcine haptoglobin (Hp), C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and Pig Major Acute Phase Protein (Pig-MAP).
- To assess the reliability and limitations of these assays under various conditions, including interfering substances and induced inflammation.
Main Methods:
- Validation of four commercial APP assays (Hp, CRP, SAA, Pig-MAP) using standard laboratory procedures.
- Assessment of intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs), linearity, and detection limits.
- Evaluation of the impact of haemolysis and lipaemia on assay results.
- Induction of inflammation in pigs using turpentine to evaluate assay responsiveness.
Main Results:
- Most assays demonstrated CVs below 20%, with exceptions for CRP and Pig-MAP at low concentrations and SAA at all concentrations.
- All methods exhibited good linearity and sufficiently low detection limits for healthy animals.
- Haemolysis significantly affected Hp and SAA, while lipaemia primarily impacted SAA.
- Induced inflammation led to >15-fold increases in CRP and SAA, and <5-fold increases in Hp and Pig-MAP.
Conclusions:
- Commercial assays for porcine Hp, CRP, SAA, and Pig-MAP are largely suitable for detecting APPs in healthy and inflamed animals.
- Assay performance can be affected by haemolysis, lipaemia, and low analyte concentrations, necessitating careful sample handling and interpretation.
- CRP and SAA show greater sensitivity to induced inflammation compared to Hp and Pig-MAP.
