Comparison of mumps-IgM ELISAs in acute infection

Claudia H Krause1, Pamela J Molyneaux, Darrel O Ho-Yen

  • 1Specialist Virology Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom. Claudia.Krause@luht.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Insights

Commercial mumps IgM-ELISA tests show variable sensitivity, with one assay performing best in early illness. Prompt diagnosis requires improved laboratory methods for mumps virus detection.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Diagnostic Assay Development

Background:

  • Scotland experienced a significant mumps outbreak with over 4000 cases in two years.
  • Prompt laboratory diagnosis of mumps is crucial for effective patient management during outbreaks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic performance of five commercial IgM-ELISAs for mumps detection.
  • To compare the sensitivity and specificity of different IgM-ELISA kits used in Scottish laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • A standardized serum panel with confirmed mumps and alternative diagnoses was distributed to laboratories.
  • Laboratories performed blinded testing using their routine commercial IgM-ELISAs.
  • Results were reported to a central laboratory for analysis.

Main Results:

  • Mumps IgM-ELISA sensitivity varied widely, ranging from 24% to 51%.
  • Assay performance improved with samples collected more than 10 days post-symptom onset.
  • Specificity was generally high, around 82% for most tested assays.

Conclusions:

  • There is significant variability in the sensitivity of commercial mumps IgM-ELISAs.
  • The Microimmune mumps-IgM ELISA demonstrated the best sensitivity for acute serum samples.
  • Laboratories should consider direct mumps virus detection methods and the use of convalescent samples for improved diagnosis.