Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Quality and safety by design.

¹Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, 540 Gather Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. James.Battles@ahrq.hhs.gov

Quality & Safety in Health Care

|December 5, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adverse-event-reporting practices by US hospitals: results of a national survey.

Quality & safety in health care·2008

Same author

Improving patient safety by instructional systems design.

Quality & safety in health care·2006

Same author

Disaster prevention: lessons learned from the Titanic.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2005

Same author

Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.

Quality & safety in health care·2004

Same author

Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards.

Quality & safety in health care·2003

Same author

A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001

Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

See all related articles

Closing the healthcare quality chasm requires a proactive design approach, not just measurement. By applying proven design methods and involving diverse professions, we can engineer quality into care and eliminate system failures.

Area of Science:

Healthcare Systems Engineering
Quality Improvement Science
Patient Safety Research

Background:

The persistent 'quality chasm' in healthcare necessitates a shift from reactive measurement to proactive strategies.
Current approaches often focus on identifying quality gaps rather than implementing solutions.
Integrating external expertise is crucial for comprehensive system redesign.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a conceptual framework for proactively designing quality into healthcare systems.
To advocate for the application of proven design methodologies in healthcare delivery.
To outline a multi-level framework incorporating key quality aims.

Main Methods:

Conceptualizing healthcare quality as a design challenge.

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a three-level framework based on the six quality aims from 'Crossing the Quality Chasm'.

Identifying applicable design methods for various healthcare components (organizational, educational, clinical, IT).

Main Results:

A proposed framework with patient-centered care as the core, safety as the second level, and efficiency, effectiveness, timeliness, and equity as the third.
Availability of established design methods applicable to healthcare system redesign.
Potential for significant improvements in quality and safety through systematic redesign.

Conclusions:

Healthcare quality can be proactively designed by shifting focus from measurement to design.
A structured, multi-level design framework integrating core quality aims is feasible.
Implementing these design methods across healthcare delivery systems can lead to major quality and safety enhancements.