Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Wishful thinking will not obviate embryo use.

Louis M Guenin1

  • 1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. guenin@hms.harvard.edu

Stem Cell Reviews
|December 5, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Exploring alternatives to embryonic stem cells, this study argues that purported non-embryo sources do not offer a moral advantage. Current alternatives may lack ethical or scientific justification compared to using donated embryos.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A proposed stem cell research policy.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2005
Same author

On classifying the developing organism.

Connecticut law review·2005
Same author

Stem cells, cloning, and regulation.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2005
Same author

Stem cells: shibboleths of development.

Stem cells and development·2005
Same author

A failed noncomplicity scheme.

Stem cells and development·2004
Same author

The morality of unenabled embryo use--arguments that work and arguments that don't.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2004

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Stem Cell Research
  • Moral Philosophy

Background:

  • Ongoing debate regarding the ethical sourcing of human pluripotent stem cells.
  • Development of alternative stem cell derivation methods to circumvent ethical concerns associated with embryonic stem cells.
  • Need for ethical and scientific evaluation of these proposed alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess the moral and scientific claims of non-embryo sources for human pluripotent stem cells.
  • To determine if shifting to these alternative sources offers a moral improvement over using surplus or donated embryos.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of proposed non-embryo stem cell derivation techniques.
  • Comparative moral evaluation of alternative methods versus the use of surplus embryos.
  • Assessment of the scientific viability and quality of pluripotent cells from proposed alternative sources.

Main Results:

  • Several proposed non-embryo alternatives lack moral justification, as their ethical underpinnings also support the use of surplus embryos.
  • Some alternative techniques are morally indefensible or risk embryo use.
  • Certain methods may fail to yield pluripotent stem cells of adequate quality.

Conclusions:

  • Adopting proposed non-embryo stem cell sources does not present a moral gain.
  • The ethical and scientific arguments for using donated embryos remain strong compared to current alternatives.
  • Further rigorous ethical and scientific scrutiny is required for non-embryonic stem cell technologies.

Related Experiment Videos