Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Whose interests are they, anyway?

Margaret E Mohrmann

    The Journal of Religious Ethics
    |December 6, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This review highlights a key bioethics book, emphasizing beneficence and a child's basic interests. Further work is needed to define these interests for critically ill children.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Must we be courageous?

    The Hastings Center report·2015
    Same author

    The OHRP and SUPPORT--another view.

    The New England journal of medicine·2013
    Same author

    Ready to listen: why welcome matters.

    Journal of pain and symptom management·2012
    Same author

    Ethical grounding for a profession of hospital chaplaincy.

    The Hastings Center report·2009
    Same author

    Substituted judgment.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2008

    Area of Science:

    • Pediatric Bioethics
    • Medical Ethics
    • Child Welfare

    Background:

    • Richard Miller's book offers a comprehensive analysis of pediatric bioethics.
    • It is noted as a pioneering work in the field.
    • The book establishes a foundational thesis for future research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and analyze Richard Miller's significant contribution to pediatric bioethics.
    • To identify areas requiring further research and development within pediatric bioethics.
    • To underscore the importance of beneficence and basic interests in pediatric medical decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and critical analysis of a seminal work in bioethics.
    • Examination of the core arguments presented in Richard Miller's book.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsDeath and Euthanasia

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of conceptual gaps and future research directions.

    • Main Results:

    • Miller's book correctly prioritizes beneficence and a child's basic interests over "best" interests.
    • The analysis confirms the book's status as a landmark in pediatric bioethics.
    • Significant work remains in defining "basic interests" and determining stakeholder perspectives.

    Conclusions:

    • Miller's work provides a crucial framework for pediatric bioethics.
    • Further research is essential to operationalize the concept of basic interests for vulnerable children.
    • Clarifying decision-making rights for seriously ill children is a critical next step.