Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian processing of vestibular information.

Jean Laurens1, Jacques Droulez

  • 1Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, CNRS UMR 7152, Collège de France, 11 place M. Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France. jean.laurens@gmail.com

Biological Cybernetics
|December 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The logarithmic memristor-based Bayesian machine.

Communications engineering·2025
Same author

A spinal cord neuroprosthesis for locomotor deficits due to Parkinson's disease.

Nature medicine·2023
Same author

The otolith vermis: A systems neuroscience theory of the Nodulus and Uvula.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2022
Same author

Influence of sensory modality and control dynamics on human path integration.

eLife·2022
Same author

Supervised Multisensory Calibration Signals Are Evident in VIP But Not MSTd.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2021
Same author

Spatial modulation of hippocampal activity in freely moving macaques.

Neuron·2021
Same journal

Harmonic memory in phasor neural networks.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Foundational issues of network models in biology.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Dynamical mechanisms for coordinating long-term working memory based on the precision of spike-timing in cortical neurons.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Fluctuation-response relations for a two-stage population of spiking neurons stimulated by common noise.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Geometric Learning Dynamics.

Biological cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

The brain uses Bayesian inference to interpret vestibular signals for self-motion perception, even with inaccurate sensory data. This processing, influenced by natural head movements, explains perceptual biases and matches experimental results.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Complex self-motion in darkness causes disorientation and illusory perceptions.
  • The brain relies on vestibular canals (angular acceleration) and otoliths (linear acceleration) for self-motion cues, but these sensors are imprecise and ambiguous.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose that the brain employs statistically optimal Bayesian inference for processing vestibular signals.
  • To investigate the link between the statistics of natural head movements and self-motion perception.
  • To develop a Bayesian model explaining perceptual biases towards low velocity and acceleration.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a Bayesian model of self-motion perception based on optimal statistical processing and natural head movement statistics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulated perceptual responses to centrifugation and off-vertical axis rotation using the developed model.

    • Main Results:

    • The Bayesian model closely replicated experimental findings for self-motion perception under centrifugation and off-vertical axis rotation.
    • Demonstrated that Bayesian inference can quantitatively link sensor noise, head movement statistics, and self-motion perception.

    Conclusions:

    • The brain's self-motion perception is governed by Bayesian inference, optimally integrating noisy vestibular inputs.
    • Natural head movement statistics introduce perceptual biases, favoring low velocity and acceleration, which are explained by the model.
    • This framework provides a quantitative understanding of how sensory limitations and movement priors shape our perception of self-motion.